Hi, On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 6:01 PM, James Henstridge <[email protected]> wrote: > Currently the Storm trunk is stored in the old pack-0.92 format that > dates back to the Bazaar 1.0 release. We've got a few branches > tracking storm stored in the newer "2a" format (made default in Bazaar > 2.0), and I was wondering if anyone would object to changing the trunk > to the newer format. > > My main reason for asking this is that changes can only be moved in > one direction between these formats (i.e. we can pull pack-0.92 > changes, but nothing can go in the other direction). So moving the > trunk forward would reduce the chance that I'd need to redo commits in > order to create a mergeable branch. > > It would also have some direct benefits, since Launchpad can handle > the newer branches better by stacking them on the trunk branch.. In > other words, uploading a new branch will only upload the changes you > made rather than Storm's entire history (which is currently ~ 3.5MB). > > The obvious down side is that if we upgrade the trunk, everyone else > will need to upgrade their branches if they want to pull new changes > from trunk. They will also need to make sure they have Bazaar 2.0 or > later. > > So what do others think?
+1 from me. Note that we have an open RT with Canonical's operations staff to have all Storm branches upgraded. Thanks, J. -- storm mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/storm
