Hi, On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Jamu Kakar <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 6:01 PM, James Henstridge <[email protected]> wrote: >> Currently the Storm trunk is stored in the old pack-0.92 format that >> dates back to the Bazaar 1.0 release. We've got a few branches >> tracking storm stored in the newer "2a" format (made default in Bazaar >> 2.0), and I was wondering if anyone would object to changing the trunk >> to the newer format. >> >> My main reason for asking this is that changes can only be moved in >> one direction between these formats (i.e. we can pull pack-0.92 >> changes, but nothing can go in the other direction). So moving the >> trunk forward would reduce the chance that I'd need to redo commits in >> order to create a mergeable branch. >> >> It would also have some direct benefits, since Launchpad can handle >> the newer branches better by stacking them on the trunk branch.. In >> other words, uploading a new branch will only upload the changes you >> made rather than Storm's entire history (which is currently ~ 3.5MB). >> >> The obvious down side is that if we upgrade the trunk, everyone else >> will need to upgrade their branches if they want to pull new changes >> from trunk. They will also need to make sure they have Bazaar 2.0 or >> later. >> >> So what do others think? > > +1 from me. Note that we have an open RT with Canonical's > operations staff to have all Storm branches upgraded.
This hasn't happened, so we've gone ahead and upgraded lp:storm. You can upgrade your own branches with: bzr upgrade lp:~<username>/storm/<branch> Thanks, J. -- storm mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/storm
