Sean Fulmer wrote:
> I'm not an expert, but I think both of you are describing Balsa...
> GNOME mail client. I think the memory footprint is around 6 megs, just
> the features you need, with no bloat. It's got filter options in the
> menu, but they don't seem to work. I'm not sure about your threading
> requirement. It caan use the same mailboxes that mutt uses, so if you
> want mutt also, they work fine together. Of course, if GNOME's not your
> bag, well, maybe it's not for you.. just my 2 cents :)
>
> =====
Balsa looked promising last time I checked but it didn't do threading
which is a big one for me and as you saw the filtering is ...as is.:-)
BTW I like GNOME's look better than KDE's but KDE seems to be more
"advanced " in features .Ofcourse the comparison is not a good one since
KDE is at 2.0 and GNOME at 1.x .
Sticking with Netscape for now.
--
The best way to escape from a problem is to solve it.
Alan Saporta
My waste of cyberspace=
http://deepblue.dyndns.org :-)
_______________________________________________
Stormlinux-users-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.stormix.com/community/lists/listinfo/stormlinux-users-list
