Crispin, Jock, lists 

I think some of the ideas here may be counterproductive. See below. 


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Crispin Pemberton-Pigott" <[email protected]> 
To: "Jock Gill" <[email protected]>, [email protected], "Stanley 
Richard" <[email protected]> 
Cc: "Discussion of biomass cooking stoves" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Sunday, December 5, 2010 8:03:44 AM 
Subject: Re: [Stoves] [biochar-policy] More on briquettes and pellets 




Dear Jock 



Very nice web pages and a well presented instructions provided by the link. 



I have a question relating to the iCan. 



Have you tried elevating the primary air holes in the outer can above the 
bottom? I understand from the photos that the elevated holes are only on the 
inner cans. 




[RWL: I would go in the opposite direction - put all primary air holes on the 
bottom inner can surface - to get more uniform (vertical only) air flow] 




The reason I ask is that I have found benefit from making the primary air 
travel downwards at least part of the vertical height. The preheats the air 
slightly and provides negative buoyancy reducing draft. As the inner can starts 
to heat up, it increases the negative buoyancy because the inner can is hotter 
and this interaction tend to self-regulate the power. 




[RWL: I don's see the value in reducing draft anywhere - we work hard usually 
to achieve it. Re regulating power, I have always been amazed that with a fixed 
primary air supply, the power level (as indicated by the apparent rate of steam 
bubble formation) was amazingly uniform - over a full hour. It is easy and 
cheap to control power levels through controlling (only) the amount of primary 
air. I think turn-down ratio is a very important parameter that needs a lot 
more work. No gas or electric stove (I presume propane, ethanol, etc) 
manufacturer would give you less than about 3:1 for turn-down ratio. This 
parameter I think is one of the main reasons we are going to see increased 
stove use of the discarded fans used for cooling computers. 




If you get a significant preheat (I would make the gap between the cans no more 
than 10mm) you can burn harder, denser fuels that will not pyrolyse with a 
normal preheat. 




[RWL: I don't know if the use of " burn harder, denser fuels" was intentional. 
I believe Jock is only attempting pyrolysis - being interested in the resultant 
char for sequestration and soil improvement. 





Re "preheat", there is plenty of opportunity to use the outer gap for upward 
flowing preheat of secondary air. Lots of stoves doing that. The downward flow 
of primary air will supply not much heat for the already pretty darn hot 
pyrolysis front. 





Nat Mulcahy's Lucia stove does have [O=Opposite] downward flowing "primary" 
(sort of a misnomer) air - but it is in the inner chamber and carries no 
oxygen. The outer chamber does a wonderful job of both preheating and premixing 
his pyrolysis gases and secondary air so as to avoid the extra height needed to 
completely combust a diffusion flame. 





I can't remember what fuels I have ever had trouble pyrolyzing - but the only 
one I never had success with is dung - the extreme other end in 
density/hardness. I can imagine however that dense fuels might be harder to get 
started. In part this is because you need optical energy from the pyrolysis 
process to heat neighboring/adjacent particles - and near the top surface, much 
of that optical energy is directed upwards. This is a good reason to use 
starter/lighter fluids or easy to start fuels (maybe oily material like 
peanuts? - which I have never tried in a stove, but peanuts are easy to light 
with a match and pincers.) 




But another thing I learned early was that there is an enormous (factor of 10?) 
difference in interior biomass particle gas flow radially vs longitudinally. 
This helps explain why chips and disk shapes light more easily than logs. 





In any case, I'd like more data to prove that hard, dense fuels are a problem 
for Jock's (or any) type of pyrolysis stove. Not a problem for most pellets or 
briquettes I guess. 





Ron 








Give it a try! IT is really easy. 



Best regards 

Crispin 





From: Jock Gill [mailto:[email protected]] 





Ron, 





I have been able to make very good char, as tested by Hugh McLaughlin, from 
grass tablets. These have a diameter of about 1.5 inches and I break them into 
wafers about 1/2 CM thick. My first batch of grass tablet biochar was actually 
made by Paul Anderson in one of his TLUDs. 





Please see this post from Nov. 2009: 
http://www.greaterdemocracy.org/archives/931 





I also find that quenching the biochar at the end of the pyrolysis is not 
critical at all. If I leave one of my iCans overnight, I lose less than half 
the charcoal. My guess is that this is the result of tuning the iCan for the 
least amount of primary air. I have noted that when the pyrolysis is over, the 
bed of charcoal emits "smoke". My goal is for zero smoke, but find that I can 
still get god biochar if the smoke is essentially gone in less than two 
minutes. My practice is to only quench after the smoke has essentially finished 
f within in about 3 minutes after the pyrolysis flames extinguish themselves. 





Cheers, 





Jock 


















Jock Gill 


P.O. Box 3 


Peacham, VT 05862 


Carbon Negative Solutions 



(G) (802) 503-1258 







On Dec 5, 2010, at 1:42 AM, [email protected] wrote: 

















Richard and 2 lists: 

Thanks for the complete response. I conclude that pellets and briquettes are 
possibly able to act similarly in char-making stoves, but briquettes look 
better in traditional stoves. Apparently not much comparative work done yet for 
advantages of production of one vs the other. 


_______________________________________________ 
Stoves mailing list 

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address 
Stoves mailing list 

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page 
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org
 

for more Biomass Cooking Stoves, News and Information see our web site: 
http://www.bioenergylists.org/ 
[email protected] 
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org
 
_______________________________________________
Stoves mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
Stoves mailing list

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
http://www.bioenergylists.org/
[email protected]
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

Reply via email to