Jock: You are right - there was a misunderstanding - on my part. Sorry. See 
below. 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jock Gill" <[email protected]> 
To: [email protected] 
Cc: "Jock Gill" <[email protected]>, "Discussion of biomass cooking stoves" 
<[email protected]>, [email protected], "Stanley 
Richard" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Sunday, December 5, 2010 2:59:46 PM 
Subject: Re: [Stoves] [biochar-policy] More on briquettes and pellets 

Ron, 


I think there is a mis-understanding. 


My iCans ONLY have primary air air holes in the bottom of the iCan. I start 
with fewer and smaller until I get a distribution pattern, number of holes, and 
hole size that is well tuned to the fuel type, size, form factor, and other 
stove parameters - such as surface area of the pyrolysis zone. 

[RWL: I had not picked up that the term "ican" refers to the inner (smaller, 
fuel-containing) can only. True? 

But new question on last few words. I have found that the "surface area of the 
pyrolysis zone" is identical to the cross-sectional area of the inner can. I 
guess that is what you meant - have you ever seen that moving "pyrolysis zone" 
be other than "flat-disk- like"? [Your "surface area" phrase made me think of 
something conical). 
Certainly larger inner can diameters require more primary air - at least to get 
the max possible power output. It is also possible that too dense and/or too 
deep a fuel may kill the operation no matter how much primary air hole total 
area. (This being the question of how large a turn-down ratio can be achieved.] 


I place the iCan inside a second, larger, can for 1] wind protection; lateral 
heat loss mitigation; safely contain loose bits of red hot charcoal; and so 
forth. 
[RWL: I like it.] 


The question is to "vent" this outer can to allow primary air access or not. If 
the choice is to vent, then where to place the holes for the primary air to 
enter? These holes in the OUTER can, are NOT on the bottom of the outer can so 
as to allow it to safely contain any hot bits. So the question is simple, how 
much venting do you create and where on the side of the outer can do you put 
the vents. 
[RWL: Understood now - but also believe that the majority of that air will 
travel upward to serve as secondary air.. OK? My preference at the moment is to 
place those primary air entry holes at the bottom the outer can - and let some 
leak around for secondary air. 
In this regard, want to warn that the bottom of the "package" can get pretty 
hot - and there needs to be a standoff arrangement of some type.] 



I agree that the ability to regulate the primary air flow into the iCan, the 
air flow to sustain the pyrolysis, would be very useful. My design goal is 
simply to create the easiest, and least expensive, introduction into the world 
of pyrolysis and biochar for young people. Sometimes good enough is just right. 
[RWL: Understood also - but I am still going to push for variable primary air 
as a key design feature - and maybe one that is acceptable/useful/important for 
classroom pedagogical purposes as well. I won't push this point until I have a 
simple solution you like. Having that flexibility can allow any TLUD to be used 
for multiple feedstocks without "retuning". As you point out, there is value 
for the teacher/student in seeing more directly/clearly how primary air supply 
magnitude changes the performance.] 


Jock - again - really glad you are driving this educational side of 
char-making. A big difficult topic. 

Ron 



I also agree with and second your comments about Nat at World Stove. 


Cheers, 


Jock 














Jock Gill 
P.O. Box 3 
Peacham, VT 05862 
Carbon Negative Solutions 

(G) (802) 503-1258 




On Dec 5, 2010, at 4:00 PM, [email protected] wrote: 




Crispin, Jock, lists 

I think some of the ideas here may be counterproductive. See below. 


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Crispin Pemberton-Pigott" < [email protected] > 
To: "Jock Gill" < [email protected] >, [email protected] , "Stanley 
Richard" < [email protected] > 
Cc: "Discussion of biomass cooking stoves" < [email protected] > 
Sent: Sunday, December 5, 2010 8:03:44 AM 
Subject: Re: [Stoves] [biochar-policy] More on briquettes and pellets 



Dear Jock 


Very nice web pages and a well presented instructions provided by the link. 


I have a question relating to the iCan. 


Have you tried elevating the primary air holes in the outer can above the 
bottom? I understand from the photos that the elevated holes are only on the 
inner cans. 


[RWL: I would go in the opposite direction - put all primary air holes on the 
bottom inner can surface - to get more uniform (vertical only) air flow] 



The reason I ask is that I have found benefit from making the primary air 
travel downwards at least part of the vertical height. The preheats the air 
slightly and provides negative buoyancy reducing draft. As the inner can starts 
to heat up, it increases the negative buoyancy because the inner can is hotter 
and this interaction tend to self-regulate the power. 


[RWL: I don's see the value in reducing draft anywhere - we work hard usually 
to achieve it. Re regulating power, I have always been amazed that with a fixed 
primary air supply, the power level (as indicated by the apparent rate of steam 
bubble formation) was amazingly uniform - over a full hour. It is easy and 
cheap to control power levels through controlling (only) the amount of primary 
air. I think turn-down ratio is a very important parameter that needs a lot 
more work. No gas or electric stove (I presume propane, ethanol, etc) 
manufacturer would give you less than about 3:1 for turn-down ratio. This 
parameter I think is one of the main reasons we are going to see increased 
stove use of the discarded fans used for cooling computers. 



_______________________________________________
Stoves mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
Stoves mailing list

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
http://www.bioenergylists.org/
[email protected]
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

Reply via email to