Paal (and 2 lists) 





Thanks for the two nice responses (below) sent a few days ago. I have combined 
them here to improve readability. Your associate (?) Otto Formo has done a nice 
job of explaining the background. I hope you can add more on the charcoal 
output mechanism and produced-char uses (the Biochar side) - as well as the 
following questions. 





A. The second message (almost same timing as the next) said: 





Crispin 

To your infomation if Dean dont' have the exact figures by hand the TLUD-ND I 
made at Stove Camp 2009 had the following settings. 

The combustion chamber had a diameter 150mm and was 180 h 

    • 55 mm free space from concentration lid up to the pot 
    • 105 mm hole in concentration lid 
    • 6 mm split between concentration lid and top of thee combustion chamber - 
4x15mm for the stand for 2 nd air 
    • 5 five mm holes 75 mm up from the bottom on the side of the combustion 
chamber 
    • [RWL1: Was the fuel always loaded below this level? If not, then what is 
the need for these holes? How deep was the fuel load for the test results given 
below? Some of next questions apply here also depending on how high the fuel 
loading is/was.] 
    • 5 five mm holes 25 mm up from the bottom on the side of the combustion 
chamber 
    • [RWL2: The purpose of these I also don't understand - believing the 13 
(next) could do the full job for supplying primary air (if you want to make 
char). I would think that secondary air entry at these holes will quickly 
consume all the char above them and make it harder to combust the 
still-upcoming pyrolysis gases from below. On the other hand, maybe this is 
useful in some cooking tasks (such as a water boiling test). ] 
    • 13 five mm holes at the bottom plate for 1 st air 
    • 15 mm space between combustion chamber an cover for preheating of 2 nd 
.air 
    • [RWL3a: Not quite understanding this last. I'd rather see secondary air 
being heated as it rises rather than being drawn down - holes at the bottom for 
this? As for some of the first dimensions, a small cross-section diagram would 
be helpful on this detail. I think you show much larger dimensions for some of 
the air entries in the several videos listed below. Perhaps you can explain any 
differences and reasons for same. Which is the newer design?] 

B. Few more below on your first of the two messages. 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Paal wendelbo" <[email protected]> 
To: "Til: \"Discussion of biomass cooking stoves\"" 
<[email protected]> 
Sent: Friday, December 3, 2010 4:17:32 AM 
Subject: Re: [Stoves] K Smith Article in Energy for Sustainable Development 




When I started my work on simple cooking stoves late 1980ties I did not know 
any thing about the concept of TLUD-ND apart from the fact we used it making 
smokeless fire when we stayed in the forest during the 2 nd ww Illegal hunting. 
By coincidence, after a lot of trying and failing I happen to make a perfect 
simple cooking stove tested at Copenhagen Technical high school in 1988 and 
found completely clean burning. .It was introduced in Malawi in 1998 with 
stamped grass as fuel. In Mozambique in 1990, with cashew nut peals as fuel. In 
1989 in Ghana, with chopped slabs as fuel. In Tanzania in 1990, in Uganda in 
1994 with straw and chopped wood as fuel, where it was given the Acholi name 
Peko Pe (no problem), in Ethiopia with briquettes of cowdung and straw as fuel, 
In Senegal with compressed grownut peals as fuel. with chopped wood and in 
China in 2003and In Zambia 2008 with chopped wood All places the same stove 
locally made by local tinsmiths with the tools they had and from plane metal 
sheets or scrap metal sheets. All working perfect without any smoke and little 
soot.. 

At Trade Fair exhibition in Kampala 1997 we were selling 500 stoves in two days 
at market prise That time 5$. 

At Aprovecho Stove Camp 2009 I made one by memory of a 3 litres tin and some 
leftover sheets, it was tested and found clean burning and given the Kirk 
Smiths Award 

[RWL3b: And presumably the same as the numbers given below and above?] 




Fuel to Cook 5L 

(8 50/1500) g 768.8 

[RWL4: I don't understand the first (8 50/1500) numbers. I presume the 768.8 
grams somehow took account of char produced? (In 28 minutes?) 


CO to Cook 5L (20) 23.0 

[RWL5: the "20" means?? The 23 is grams ? Out of 768.8? Same questions for 
particulates data (1500? 223.1?) next - which latter must be in mg?] 


PM to Cook 5L (1500 223.1 

15,000/25,000mkJ 


[RWL6: why two numbers above? The units aren't familiar. For almost anything 
biomass, I would expect about 17 MJ/kg; with your input kg, I expect more like 
12 MJ. Anybody measure fuel moisture content?] 

Energy to Cook 5L 14,807 

[RWL7: Units probably kJ?] 


Time to boil 5 litres min 28.1 

[RWL7': This can be converted to an average (using my estimate) of (12,000 kJ/ 
(28.1 minutes * 60 seconds) = 200/28.1 = 7.1 kW. It would be helpful if this 
number was part of any stove data. I feel this number is too high for normal 
cooking and simmering - but it depends a lot on the heat transfer efficiency 
(about which we know nothing in this test)] 


CO2 to Cook 5L708.6 708.6 

[RWL8: If you consumed 768.8 grams of fuel, I would expect the CO2 weight to be 
much higher than 708.6 grams - unless there was a lot of char produced. Hope 
you or Dean can explain this number. I am thinking you probably didn't use this 
much fuel - and that char production hasn't been properly accounted for (since 
I think Dean should know the CO2 exhaust gas content pretty well. How often is 
a CO2 measurement recorded? Your (anyone's) thoughts?] 




Biochar has entered the arena and made the discussion about cooking stoves a 
bit more interesting. And Dean Still is right when he says by TLUD-ND you can 
choose between energy for simmering or biochar. Just by stopping cooking 
process when flame is ended you will have about 150-200 gram of biochar. 

[RWL9: Which must come into play in your above data - but I don't see how it 
was handled.. I have not liked the way char production is handled in the USAID 
formulas from 20 years ago. Can you give the formula so I can re-raise that 
topic?] 


Peko Pe which mean “no problem” according to the Acholi tribe women have a 
problem and that is infrastructure on fuel. Fuel, stove and user is one unit 
which can not be separated, If you don’t have the fuel to an appropriate price 
you will not manage.. 

Fuel and stoves is a part of the social life in a community, a part of the 
commerce and the communication in the society.. 

The charcoal business is the key to a successful approach. They have the full 
infrastructure intact and can easy change from charcoal to alternative biomass 
for cooking. [RWL10: I hope you are right on this. My hope is that today's 
charcoal sellers (or someone maybe helping them) can supply 
wood/grass/pellets/briquettes and receive back about 25% char in exchange - and 
later handle all the paper work for getting carbon credits (after assuring the 
char made into into the ground). Do you think that could happen?] 





. The local tinsmiths have the tools and the knowledge for production. They 
need only some guidelines, a template and customers for this simple technology. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=amaUDK6VyRg 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gi3Xx7NtTGw&feature=related 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsfuVGBi4fc&feature=related 




[RWL11: It seems to me that in both the videos and the description by Dean 
Still of TLUD testing that there has been no means of varying your primary air. 
This is fine in a speed test to bring 5 L of water to boil - but is missing a 
valuable feature of TLUDs (or any modern stove). Can you clarify whether you 
have been varying primary air magnitude in any way? 





Thanks in advance for any more data. Ron 





With regards Paal W [email protected] 
_______________________________________________ 
Stoves mailing list 

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address 
Stoves mailing list 

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page 
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org
 

for more Biomass Cooking Stoves, News and Information see our web site: 
http://www.bioenergylists.org/ 
[email protected] 
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org
 
_______________________________________________
Stoves mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
Stoves mailing list

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
http://www.bioenergylists.org/
[email protected]
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

Reply via email to