Dear Dean,

I think this is a great suggestion. And after we test the stove fuels and determine the range 'worst to best' I can do some testing on them here at the lab. Goal is to see if we can find simple test methods that is able to measure the differences we see in the stove test. The next step will be to verify by taking the same fuel and making physical changes to it in verifying degrees, test it in a stove and plot the results. Something like that.

Now we are on our way to characterize biomass fuels for individual stoves. I can't do it without stove testing and, I think, I can help you, Dean with providing lab testing.


Regards
Frank





Dean Still wrote:

Dear Richard,

When the TLUD has proper fuels it can burn very cleanly. So expertize will become more and more necessary to help design processed fuels that emit 90% less CO and PM in practice. Maybe we can make the focus of the next Summer Stove Camp "How to Make/Find Clean Burning Fuels for TLUDs"?

All Best,

Dean

On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Richard Stanley <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Otto,
    Having introduced the briquettes with the godfather of the
    technology-- Dr Ben Bryant( U. Washington, Seattle, Washington) --
    in Haiti in 2001, and subsequently having worked with several
    Haitian groups online to date, I have to say that the resources
    are there in-country. They are even more plentiful now with all
    the foreign aid packaging/paper and general waste generated as a
    result.

    Emergency relief, for all its  obvious and good intentions not
    withstanding...I'm sure that we all agree that Haiti's solution in
    the long run,  lies in meaningful employment, not aid handouts.
     It is key to focus on that aspect and not more distribution of
    pre packaged solutions  that determines long term stability of not
    only the environment but the population and the politics as well.

    Having said that, ex president Clinton's observed "one cent
    solution" is apparently turning out to be a good deal more costly
    than that, eh?

    That the producers are using trash  (as opposed  to agro residues
    and carboniferous commercial processing wastes)   is an assured
    invitation for 1), substantial cost in sorting and/or 2), lots of
    smoke and stink and other things one does not want in a fire,
    esp., in a cookstove.

    Your notes about the briquettes thermal performance though,
    suggest a much deeper problem in the way the project was planned
    and organised in the first place.

    Let me back up a bit here for some explanation of my reasoning:
    There are two levels of briquetting:
    The first is the quick-fix operation which sees an easy and quick
    entry, with a great photo op and a big development splash in the
    media..
    Usually too, there is a great focus on the pressing and the type
    of press used but really pressing has little to do with quality of
    the final product at least in comparison to the processing of the
    biomass that preceeds it.  But processing is not the sexy part for
    big splash development: Seeing briquettes pop out of the mold is !
    Now quick fix briquetting will usually continue as long as the
    media is there and/or political / donor / private sector subsides
    are there to support production.  It  gains lots of attention
    because of the very NOTION of the idea, (or the name of the donor
    involved),  but not necessarily because of its substance in terms
    of practical self sustaining impact in the long run...In-depth
    thinking of the conseqences of the aid is not a priority..  It is
    where, several months into a project, and generally months even
    years after training, one learns about poor quality briquettes and
    cost issues, frankly.

    Briquetting at level 202 is a different story:
    It involves careful attention to the would be producer and their
    awareness of what it is they will be doing--for whom and for what.
    Ie.,  what impact it will have, not only on their environment but
    -of far more immediate consequence-what impact the project will
    have on  their own economic and socal survival.
    The planning of such a project also focuses first on the
    marketability of the product..the more ususal production costing,
    pricing, packaging, the barriers and  opportunities present in the
    market place.
    Planning also has lots to do with assessment of resources &
    agoresidue management, (which is to say something much beyond just
    use of paper). It includes selection and pretesting, chopping,
    moistening, partially decomposing-- then recombining with same or
    other biomass-- to create unique fuels-- tailored to the local
    marketplace. Some for example may have aromas traditionally used
     for health or just ambiance. In most all cases they will be
    blended according to the  cooking needs of the local market..

    And of course there is lots of thought about how the briquettes
    will be used:  What about the stove  ( or for that matter, no
    stove three stone or other burning "appliance") . What  (if any)
    modifications would have to be made to optimise performance.

    Thats briquetting 202 and you only find that kind of skill where
    the product is being privately produced and the seller depends up
    on the sale of it and their sustained local credibility for their
    living..Its basically the typical marketplace and/or local
    community environment you find in most of the third world.  In
    using the term private enterprise, I use it loosely to include
    conventional private enterprise as well as  community or specific
    interest group-based enterprises. All of these can work equally
    well --as long as they are not subsidised or externally
    steam-rolled by politics or institutional interests and left alone
    to be working in direct response to their local market. The market
    too can also be an institution, a clinic, a  hospital school or
    the literal commercial market, as along as the same acountability
    , at risk -- at reward elements are at play.
    With now abou 15 years in the game  are really quite confident
    that biquettes can work and work quite well under a wide variety
    of resource conditions, cultures and applications. Therefore where
    briquettes are "discovered to smoke or not provide much heat" or
    "cost too much" the question therefore has to be asked,  "where
    and how were they trained, under what specific circumstances"?

    By comparison to our wood, much less pellet fuel  ...A well made
    briquette is in fact, be a designer fuel: It is offers far greater
    variability of content and application. I therefore wonder really,
    who is dealing in something more inferior here...

    As to moisture content, agreed that we are not in Norway but we
    know a bit about seasoning wood too.  (Maybe many of your cousins,
    like many other good Scandanavians taught us about that, here  in
    the pacific northwest !  The briquette is dried to ambient
    moisture, whatever that is. It is both highly permeable and porus,
    in comparison to wood. It can be bone dried from ambient moisture
    in a few minutes by hanging alongside the stove exterior wall or
    near it, before insertion== something many are finding very good
    results with, in fact..The measure of dryness is again something
    one also learns pretty much onsite, in Briquetting 202..

    One cent solutions may come and go...but the quality of a truely
    embedded process is worth its weight in gold.

    I would warmly invite you to the next briquette producers workshop
    like the one we just hosted in Arusha Tanzania, to see for
    yourself what I am talking about. We can send you a report of that
    conference if you or anybody reading this is interested...The task
    for us now is not how to improve their own skills ( I doubt if we
    could) but rather how to get these real producer and trainers to
    communicate with each other. Hang on and enjoy the ride, as we
    have lots to learn from the real producers and users and trainers,
    in the process.

    All the best Otto,
     Sorry to sound like a preacher on this, especially to someone who
    could just as easily preach to me through his own unique experience .

    Richard Stanley
    www.legacyfound.org <http://www.legacyfound.org>








    On Jan 7, 2011, at 12:29 AM, Otto Formo wrote:

    > Dear all and Richard,
    > I was told that Nataniel in World Stove manage to get hold of
    some pellets from Georgia and shipped to Haiti?!
    > Thats a total different story, here we are talking about a
    disaster sone and the forestcover on Haiti is close to 2% of its
    originally.
    > The need of suitable biomass fuel for households was also in an
    emergency phase, and still are, I belive...............
    >
    > What I also have heard from Haiti, is that Clinton`s "One Cent
    Solution" briquettes or pucks has not been a success story due to
    the fact of its low energy content and diffyculty to ignite.
    > Iam not surprised, because I have allways been wondering how you
    can add water into a biomass and later sundry it to become an
    efficient fuel.
    > In the cold winters of Norway we can realy FEEL the difference
    of good and bad firewood, either dry, 10% density or raw, from the
    heat transfer of the stove.
    >
    > About Jean`s question:
    > This is in AFRICA and costs is not an issue here and the
    agriwaste are avaiable according to my knowledge of english as my
    second or even third language.
    > To Jean`s further question about.....or both?:
    > I would just say like Paal:
    > Stoves and fuel are linked together...........
    > Just like the Mbawula and charcoal in Zambia.
    >
    > Why give the people of the developing world a "second hand"
    solution, when it can be "solved permanently"?
    >
    > Look at the cellphone industry...............
    >
    > We are going to Sweden, after our visit to Washington next week,
    to see a GEK gasifier to be assembled at the University of
    Uppsdala and find out how it works on pellets.
    >
    > Otto
    >
    >> From: Richard Stanley [[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>]
    >> Sent: 2011-01-06 23:40:06 MET
    >> To: Discussion of biomass cooking stoves
    [[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>]
    >> Subject: Re: [Stoves] When to choose fuel saving stoves over
    briquettes?
    >>
    >> Jean,
    >> Perhaps they could get a donor to import pellets like they
    attempted in Haiti eh ?
    >>
    >> Less facetiously, do you mean to say that there is no
    agricultural residues: leaves, stalks, grasses, straws, fronds
    fens water based weeds etc, chaff husks etc. available ? As well
    are you saying that there are no bio-wastes from commercial
    processing of biomass: viz.,  sawdust, paper, cartonboard. If that
    is so, then you must be descibing a refugee situation because
    there could be little chance of sustained habitation otherwise.
    >> The needs of one human being in the tropica and at up to say
    1500 meters can easily be met by 300 grams of such wastes or
    combinations of same.. 300 grams is abou one armful of loosely
    gathered collection of such material at ambient moisture content.
    Out theirya  Applciations  manual lays out a series of sustainable
    offtakes ( after soild amendment, tilth and even animal feed
    requirements are taken into consideration ---according to various
    land forms and land use patterns, from rural farmland, forest
    land, dry savannah, to even the urban setting...
    >> I would kindly ask where you are intending to set up the
    briquetting activity..Perhaps we or the hundreds we know of may
    know of someone who is already there producing briquettes who can
    train and equip your group. They ill also be best able to tell you
    whether or not it is feasible, with what resources..
    >>
    >> Kind regards,
    >>
    >> Richard Stanley
    >> www.legacyfound.org <http://www.legacyfound.org>
    >> NW Obamaland
    >>
    >> On Jan 6, 2011, at 12:15 PM, Jean Kim Chaix wrote:
    >>
    >>> Hi, stovers.
    >>> Question: a community in Africa, where woodfuel is in short
    supply, is considering starting a briquette program. (The area
    does have access to ag waste for briquette-making.) If cost is not
    an issue, should the community invest in briquette making
    technology or try distributing high efficiency cookstoves? Or both?
    >>> Thanks in advance.
    >>>
    >>> --
    >>> J. Kim Chaix
    >>> CEO & Founder
    >>>
    >>> Green Spaces NYC
    >>> 394 Broadway, 5th fl.
    >>> New York, NY 10013
    >>> USA
    >>> (+1) 917.378.8670
    >>> http://charcoalproject.org
    >>>
    >>> _______________________________________________
    >>> Stoves mailing list
    >>>
    >>> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
    >>> Stoves mailing list
    >>>
    >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
    >>>
    
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org
    >>>
    >>> for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our
    web site:
    >>> http://www.bioenergylists.org/
    >>> [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    >>>
    
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org
    >>


    _______________________________________________
    Stoves mailing list

    to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
    Stoves mailing list

    to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
    
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

    for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web
    site:
    http://www.bioenergylists.org/
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org


------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Stoves mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
Stoves mailing list

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
http://www.bioenergylists.org/
[email protected]
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

_______________________________________________
Stoves mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
Stoves mailing list

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
http://www.bioenergylists.org/
[email protected]
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

Reply via email to