Dear Martin

Thanks very much for the time you have taken to translate the German patent. 
Comments are included below...
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Boll, Martin Dr. 
  To: [email protected] 
  Cc: 'Frans Peeters' 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 6:46 PM
  Subject: Re: [Stoves] old patent-paper about a saw-dust stoves


  Dear Kevin, Marc, Crispin and all,

   

  I hope my rough and ready translation (link to the Original text below) will 
be exact enough.

  Those patent/law formulations are somehow twisted (the other possible 
translation of "verdreht" would be crazy J ) and difficult to understand even 
in the native language

  If there is some doubt to be right, or lack of understanding, use the very 
good dictionary 

  LEO Deutsch-Englisches Wörterbuch

  -Which I am often forced to use to understand English texts, even from the 
stoves-list; but worse the multiple-sensed abbreviations.

   

  Fritz Kaftanski Koeln am Rhein (Germany)

  Sawdust stove with insert-firing

  Patented in Germany beginning from November 28th 1922

   

  Object of the invention is a saw-dust stove with insert-firing in order to 
burn saw-dust an piece/lump (sized) fuel as Coal, wood and so on.

  It is possible to use the insert-firing in already existing saw-dust-stoves, 
without outer changing of the stove, as e.g.  mounting fire- or ash-doors and 
so on.

        Those stoves for burning saw-dust are composed mainly (as shown in Fig 
Abb3  ) out of a mantle, a cylindrical insert, which serves as fuel container, 
and the essential part (e),

        with its help the centre burning channel is created..



  # OK... it looks like the "essential part (e)" is the cylindrical stick used 
to form the hole up the middle of the packed sawdust.



   As there is lack of saw-dust or similar fuel, it is not possible to run such 
a stove with coal or other piece-shaped fuel, because there is no griddle, und 
especially, because saw-dust -stoves have neither  firing nor ash-doors. 
Following the invention there is the possibility to run the saw-dust-stove, as 
desired with flour-shaped and piece-shaped fuel and to run a saw-dust-stove by 
use of the insert-firing without essential change into a coal-stove..



  # I think what they are saying here is that the sawdust stove will not work 
on coal, because there are no entry points for air or ash removal. However, if 
no sawdust is available it can be run with "flour-shaped and piece-shaped 
fuel". I think what they mean here is "flour sized fuel", and "small pieces of 
fuel". 



  Fig 1 Saw-dust-stove with insert-firing, view from above

  Abb 2 insert-stove in vertical cut from the side Abb.3 saw-dust-stove with 
inbuilt insert-firing in cross-section

  The insert-firing consists mainly out of the housing d11 wit side 
hooking-edges. In the housing is the basket-griddle a . It is with sufficient 
distance from the wall of the housing d11 respectively d1 in that hooked, so 
that kindling can be brought in.  The housing d11 is at same time 
fire-starting-basket and ash-basket and it has a door for regulating the 
air-administration.



  # It appears to me that the assembly in Abb 2 (Figure 2) is a standard basket 
grate and ash collector system that someone could purchase to sit on a bucket, 
to make a coal burning system. "a" are grate bars, "b" is a sliding damper and 
"c" is a lever, or means to move teh slide damper to control primary air to 
coal in a basket grate. Does that make sense to you?



  In the bottom there is opening for ash removing containing an closing-clap c. 
This opening serves as well as duct for the heat-gas into the stove, when the 
basket is used as stove/burning-chamber. 



  # OK... what I think they mean here is that when the damper "b" is open and 
there is no coal in the basket grate, sawdust pyrolysis gases from below, are 
burned to completion in the basket grate, which now serves as a combustion 
volume.



  When used as saw-dust-stove it serves as centre-piece c as insert-opening.



  # I think what they are saying here is that when the basket grate "a" and 
cover "b" are removed, the hole helps to center the cylindricsl rod used to 
make a hole in the sawdust.



  By the position of the griddle-basket is it possible to start the fire from 
top, without a stove-starting-door at the side. By this manner of starting the 
fire, the fire burns from down (von unten) to top (nach oben). Before placing 
the inset-firing it is possible to place paper. To start the fire, it is 
sufficient to light the paper from above.



  # I do not understand this. It seems like they are suggesting to put paper 
(or kindling) on top of the sawdust bed and "Top Light" it. Could they mean 
that "... the fire from teh kildling burns downward to the top of the sawdust?" 
It appears in Figure 3 that there is another damper and ash pit at the bottom 
of the packed sawdustwith another sliding damper that could be opened to allow 
primary air up through the center hole formed by the cylinderical form. This 
being the case, they are describing a TLUD combustion configuration.

   

  The rest text is about rights for the patent. -I don't know if there are 
still rights on that, but now after 85 years I guess that is history.



  # Usually patents are good for 20 years.



  # OK... this looks like an interesting concept, even if 85 years old! Rather 
than a common "bottom lit packed sawdust" stove, that has a tendancy to 
increase its heat output as teh hole enlarges, with the "top lit packed 
sawdust" concept, the tendancy to overheat late in teh burn should be lessened. 
This system should work well with dry sawdust, that would ignite on teh top 
surface rather easily, but then, if dry, it might not pack well, and the hole 
may tend to close off prematurely. Or, the fire may tend to advance down the 
hole.



  # Does anyone on the List have a Sawdust Stove System where tehy could try to 
operate it in "top lit fashion?



  Best wishes,



  Kevin

   

  That's so far the translation.

   

  Marc, you can have a look to the DEOM-stove  
(http://www.deomturbo.com/fonctionnement-poele-luxembourg.asp ) 

  made in Belgium and France, which can burn as well saw-dust. This type of 
stove is sold in Great Britain as well. Look at: http://www.relaxstoves.co.uk/

  The difference between both is the exit of the flue-pipe. The British has on 
top, the DEOM has rear.

  I know, there are different needs for the chimney-length between both and I 
think this is because of that different flue-gas-outlet.

  Possibly you are interested, to know that this type of stove is as well built 
as a cooking stove with baking-oven. Look at:

  http://www.deomturbo.com/cuisiniere-feu-bois-luxembourg.asp

   

  Crispin, thanks for your general comments about old stoves/inventions and 
their alterations. It is the same the line I am thinking, naturally without 
your profound knowledge.

   

   

  Regards

   

  Martin

   

  P.S. "Lonely logs don't like to burn" (MB)

   

   

   

   

   

     The links in original language:

   

    Cover-sheet with the description for the intention of the insert 
("Einsatz") 

   

    http://www.collection-appareils.fr/brevet/Kaftanski/DE423728/page1.pdf

   

     Drawings with description:

   

    http://www.collection-appareils.fr/brevet/Kaftanski/DE423728/page2.pdf

   

     

   

    Sometimes progress can happen by altering old ideas.

   

    Let the stovers know if you would like to modernize it for whatever purpose.

   

    Best wishes for the New Year!

   

     

   Regards

   Martin

   



------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Stoves mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
Stoves mailing list

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
http://www.bioenergylists.org/
[email protected]
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

Reply via email to