Crispin (cc stoves) 




I like the computations you have provided, but think there are additional 
efficiencies needing computation. Yours below gives zero benefit to the (very 
sizeable) charcoal production.- which obviously will entail some howls from 
those (like me) interested in Biochar. 




First, I think this sort of efficiency measurement should be done without a pot 
lid. The 22% number which is now measuring something about the tightness of the 
lid (and not related to the stove) should jump to above 25%, I guess. 




I will send an Excel spread sheet to Erin and Tom on this – so others can play 
with it. (I am sending it to Crispin separately and can do same for anyone 
writing me.) That SS shows that about 50% of the initial energy remains in the 
produced char, so I say that makes the overall stove efficiency, making no 
other changes in Crispin's work, about 75% (or 25% "loss" – not 75% loss). That 
is, I claim that just adding the boiling and charcoal-making efficiencies 
together is valid. The missing 25% is energy that was not captured usefully. 





But, even without adding the charcoal – making efficiency, one can 
approximately double (as opposed to the above-stated tripling) Crispin's 
calculated 22% “boil-away” efficiencies by dividing the useful output by the 
net energy consumed in the boiling task, not by the total amount available . To 
repeat - I calculate that about half the initial available switchgrass energy 
is still available in the produced char, and that this MUST be accounted for 
when comparing a pyrolysis stove with a combusting stove. This comes closer to 
the efficiency on the water boiling side, but still does not fully capture the 
value of the char. The lost energy is about half of the non-char energy (not 
3/4 of the input energy - as implied with a 22 or 25% efficiency computation). 





To restate, with simple numbers that might result with a re-test without a pot 
lid, that hypothetically finds that 25% of the energy was productively used in 
boiling the water and also found that half the energy remained in the char: 




Boiling: eff1 = ¼; (Crispin-computation yesterday, approximately) 







Char-making eff2 = ½ (This value given in many char papers – and I found – 
almost exactly - in this case) 




My preference: eff3 = eff1 +eff2 = eff1+ 2*eff1 = 3* eff1 = ¾ (I believe that 
having the same denominator when calculating efficiencies is essential. Of the 
¾ useful output 2/3 is in the char and 1/3 is in the boiled water; one quarter 
of the input energy was not captured.) 




Combined (EPA-like) eff4 = eff1/(1-eff2) = eff1/(1-1/2) = 2 eff1 = ½ (I think 
this undervalues the char – and has no theoretical basis when computing 
efficiencies. It does a better job of bringing in the char, but not the correct 
calculation. This says that about half of the available energy passing the pot 
is captured. It does not give enough credit to the char. 




The above formula (incorrectly used by almost everyone for stoves) for eff4 was 
developed at a time when char was not desired and takes advantage of the fact 
that for small x: 




(1+x) approximately equals 1/(1-x); Example 1.02 approximately equals 1/(0.98) 
= 1.0204 




Obviously one should not use this formula when x is a big number like 0 .5. 




So - to repeat, Crispin's 22% has been calculated correctly - but it 
drastically undervalues this particular stove (and all char-making pyrolysis 
stoves). The standard efficiency formula used by EPA does better, but still 
undervalues char-making. 




I think more than one efficiency is needed to describe what is happening. 

Ron (no inserts below) 
----- Original Message -----
From: "Crispin Pemberton-Pigott" <[email protected]> 
To: "Stoves" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 7:34:07 PM 
Subject: [Stoves] TLUD Test with Switchgrass Pellets 




Dear Roger S and Switchgrass Fans 



Roger this will be of interest because the fuel came from you! 



In preparation for the demo to the Chinese stove delegation I ran a single test 
with 8.85mm diameter switchgrass pellets in a Grasifier TLUD stove. 



The stove weighs 645 grams. The fuel added was 1050 grams. 



After it was running well (perhaps 10 minutes because it lit slowly) I put on a 
donut-shaped steel plate with 4 bolts that served as pot rests. It boiled 1.7 
litres of water quickly but I was not tracking the heating rate. I was looking 
at burn quality and the char produced. Boiling times another time. 



There was too much primary air after a while though it was good to have during 
ignition. The pyrolysation rate was too high after a while so I closed all the 
6mm holes (there were 5) but one. It ‘cooked’ the pot for about two hours. The 
char remaining was in the form of pellets which remained quite strong. A 
picture of the char is attached. It evaporated nearly all the water by the time 
the flame went out. Some 340 g of water remained in the pot (with lid). 



The char was spread on a concrete floor where it smoked for a few minutes. 
Nothing done except spreading it out to cool. Afterwards it was collected and 
weighed. 



Fuel (air dry, est 10% moisture): 1050 g 

Dry fuel mass 945 g 

Char yield: 365 g 

Char yield as % of initial fuel mass: 34.8% 



The ash content is about 10% for switchgrass, right? If so: 



Ash content of the initial fuel: 94.5 g 

Ash content of the char: 94.5 g 

Dry Ash-free content of the initial fuel: 850.5 g 

Dry Ash-free content of the char: 270.7 

Carbon content of the char (est 88% of non-ash content): 238 g 



Estimated heat content 16 MJ/kg, x 1.05 kg = 16.8 MJ 

Water heated 1.7 litres = 0.676 MJ 

Water evaporated = 1360 g = 3.070 MJ 

Total heat applied = 3.746 MJ 

Average thermal efficiency from for the entire burn = 22.3%. 



Final note: the char will not burn in this device. 



Regards 

Crispin 


_______________________________________________ 
Stoves mailing list 

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address 
[email protected] 

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page 
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org
 

for more Biomass Cooking Stoves, News and Information see our web site: 
http://www.bioenergylists.org/ 

_______________________________________________
Stoves mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
[email protected]

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
http://www.bioenergylists.org/

Reply via email to