Paul, list etal. adding Priya and AD Karve as ccs. 

My experience in this "attribute-list-stove-type" activity has mostly been 
through dialog with Dr. Priya Karve. Last month, she was on a GACC panel (which 
I missed) entitled: "Selecting the Most Appropriate Technologies for Your 
Consumers". As CEO of Samuchit, she has been selling several types of stoves 
and certainly can take both a researcher and a user perspective. See 
www.samuchit.com (the commercial side of ARTI, now including also her father A. 
D. ). Priya has given this topic a lot of thought. (I have given some - not a 
lot - being on the research end of the spectrum - and seeing many ways to 
improve stoves.) 

Last year, we each tried placing 100 points in a column similar to that started 
by Lanny. We found ourselves quite divergent. At issue will be how one weights 
the various categories or items. I have concluded that self weighting is likely 
the most appropriate way to analyze this topic -- if someone puts their 100 
points (the number needn't be specified) on one item, that is telling you a lot 
(but I would want hundreds if not thousands of inputs). If an important topic 
is not on your list, it is not apt to come up spontaneously very much. That is 
why I liked Jock Gill's contribution this AM. There should be a different list 
for groups like GACC. 

This to ask if anyone who attended GACC can report on the conclusions of that 
particular panel. Especially I hope that Priya and AD can add some thoughts. 

Ron 

----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Anderson" <[email protected]> 
To: "Robert Fairchild" <[email protected]> 
Cc: "Kevin" <[email protected]>, "Hugh McLaughlin" 
<[email protected]>, "Discussion of biomass cooking stoves" 
<[email protected]> 
Sent: Monday, April 8, 2013 10:01:45 AM 
Subject: Re: [Stoves] Stove Matrix version 2 


To all, 

I remember the Matrix to have columns at the right side to show 
LPG/alcohol/solar, etc. 

I am looking for it, but that was 4 years ago. 

Paul 
Paul S. Anderson, PhD  aka "Dr TLUD"
Email: [email protected] Skype: paultlud  Phone: +1-309-452-7072
Website: www.drtlud.com On 4/8/2013 6:01 AM, Robert Fairchild wrote: 



        All, 
Here it is as an attachment. 
Bob 

--- On Mon, 4/8/13, Paul Anderson <[email protected]> wrote: 

<blockquote>

From: Paul Anderson <[email protected]> 
Subject: Re: [Stoves] [biochar] Understanding FUEL EFFICIENCY vs Energy 
efficiency 
To: "Discussion of biomass cooking stoves" <[email protected]> 
Cc: "Kevin" <[email protected]> , [email protected] , "Hugh 
McLaughlin" <[email protected]> , "Bob Fairchild" <[email protected]> 
Date: Monday, April 8, 2013, 2:25 AM 




Dear Kevin, Crispin and all, 

We are in agreement. 

"Stove Testing" is an expression that has different meaning to different 
people. WBT is one of the tests of stoves. Just like we want to have the Safety 
analysis reported. 

Kevin's list of questions should be part of a Table of Stove Characteristics 
that includes price, etc etc etc. I have not seen such a table since I posted a 
Cookstove Matrix in March 2006. Here is the description and the link, but I 
cannot see the actual matrix. Erin or Tom, can you find it? 

<blockquote>
http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/stove-matrix 

Anyway, the point is that we need these kinds of consolidations of the many 
factors. 

Paul 
Paul S. Anderson, PhD  aka "Dr TLUD"
Email: [email protected] Skype: paultlud  Phone: +1-309-452-7072
Website: www.drtlud.com On 4/8/2013 12:40 AM, Kevin wrote: 

<blockquote>

Dear Paul 

I would like to suggest a different way of looking at things.... look at a 
stove through the eyes of the customer. 

(The "Customer" is the person or Organization that pays the Manufacturer for 
the Stove.) 

The fundamental question should be: "What does the Customer want?" 

Does the Customer want the stove to produce biochar? 

Does the Customer want the stove to have the least fuel input to accomplish a 
stated task? 

Does the Customer want to minimize products of combustion vented into the 
living space? 

Does the Customer want the stove to provide a space heating benefit for the 
stove user? 

Does the Customer want a stove that requires extended burn times between 
refuelling, and a minimum of attendance? 

Does the Customer want a single firing rate throughout the burn, OR, a "Two 
Level Firing Rate capability, OR a large range of firing capabilities? 

etc.... 

"Efficiency" is basically a measure of "Resource Input to accomplish a desired 
task" 

It is not the purpose of "testing" to promote a particular technology or 
philosophy, but rather, to measure the effectiveness of accomplishing a given 
task of importance to the Customer.. 

"The Customer is the King." Proper Testing Protocols should allow a Customer to 
test a range of stoves, under a variety of circumstances, so that he will be 
able to select the stove that best meets his requirements. 

Best wishes, 

Kevin 

<blockquote>

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Paul Anderson 
To: Discussion of biomass cooking stoves ; Hugh McLaughlin ; Bob Fairchild ; 
[email protected] 
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 1:50 AM 
Subject: [biochar] Understanding FUEL EFFICIENCY vs Energy efficiency 






Dear Stovers and Biochar makers, 

We are NOT sufficiently emphasizing that TLUDs/char-maker stoves can use 
fuel other than stick wood. When burning briquettes and pellets and 
cobs and shells (which most other stoves cannot burn very well), we are 
NOT burning tree-sourced fuel. 

Crispin correctly says that a kg of wood in and pyrolyzed is no longer 
wood, and therefore is FUEL used, and that relates to FUEL Efficiency. 
TLUDs can consume more wood because they are converting some of that 
wood into charcoal. That is different from ENERGY efficiency, which 
can allow calculations for the energy in the charcoal that is not used. 

Especially in char-making stoves, energy efficiency is better than the 
fuel efficiency IF USING WOOD. But if the fuel is not wood, then the 
WOOD-FUEL efficiency is 100% (none was burned in the cooking of the 
meal), and the ENERGY efficiency might be very good, while the FUEL 
efficiency (burning ag residues, dung, etc) might be low in comparison 
with other stoves, but no trees were cut or burned. 

About the above, there will need to be some education given to the stove 
community (including GACC and manufacturers and governments). WHAT fuel 
is burned does make a difference if FUEL efficiency is an important 
criteria when evaluating stoves. 

Just because wood is the traditional fuel used in stove testing does not 
mean that stoves that can also burn OTHER biomass should be judged on 
the WOOD-FUEL efficiency calculations. For places like Haiti, Rwanda, 
and many large zones of numerous large countries, to be able to cook 
WITHOUT FOREST DEGRADATION should be a major reason for choosing TLUD 
stoves. 

Having written about this here does not mean that the message has 
reached the decision makers and those who report test results on 
cookstoves. And the makers of "stick-wood-burning stoves" are unlikely 
to want to tell this message to others. 

Because the GACC is about stoves AND FUELS, I hope that proper 
recognition can be given in the discussions and decisions about the 
stoves that can have 100% avoidance of cutting wood, if that is important. 

Paul 

-- 
Paul S. Anderson, PhD aka "Dr TLUD" 
Email: [email protected] Skype: paultlud Phone: +1-309-452-7072 
Website: www.drtlud.com 


__._,_.___ 
        Reply via web post      Reply to sender         Reply to group  Start a 
New Topic       Messages in this topic (1) 
Recent Activity: 

    • New Members 3 

Visit Your Group 
Yahoo! Groups
Switch to: Text-Only , Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use • Send us 
Feedback 

. 

__,_._,___ 
</blockquote>


_______________________________________________
Stoves mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address 
[email protected] to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use 
the web page 
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org
 for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site: 
http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/ 
</blockquote>


</blockquote>

</blockquote>


_______________________________________________ 
Stoves mailing list 

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address 
[email protected] 

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page 
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org
 

for more Biomass Cooking Stoves, News and Information see our web site: 
http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/ 

_______________________________________________
Stoves mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
[email protected]

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/

Reply via email to