Dear Paul

 

Several questions are asked:

 

>I am left with the impression that the main focus of the GACC is the health of 
>a cook as she cooks a meal. 

 

The GACC was initially conceived as a women’s health project, achieved through 
the promotion of lower PM and CO emissions stoves. It was an initiative of Ms 
Hillary Clinton when she was Secretary of State and initiated from within the 
White House.

 

>If all poor people in the world could afford bottled gas through a series of 
>national or international subsidies, would the mission of the GACC be 
>fulfilled? 

 

Technically, yes.

 

>Does the GACC put the use of fossil fuels such as coal on the same footing as 
>the use of biomass fuels such as rice hulls? 

 

As far as I know, it is fuel-agnostic. That does not mean the sponsors or 
individual actors do.

 

>Would a clean-burning coal stove in the eyes of the GACC be just as acceptable 
>as a clean-burning biomass stove in areas where both coal and rice hulls are 
>available? 

 

It is achieves the policy objectives of the programme, yes. If not, no. It is 
likely the evaluation would be made holistically and intelligently. That does 
not mean they would agree with either your interpretations or definitions.

 

>Also what is the policy of the GACC with regard to biochar? 

 

I have not heard of any official position or policy. They may choose not to 
take a position.

 

>If biochar is not combusted in a stove but incorporated into the soil, would 
>this be understood by the GACC as a huge inefficiency in the transfer of heat 
>to a pot?

 

Of course. I am not sure about the word ‘huge’.  It is relative to the need for 
increased (or ‘not reduced’) fuel consumption. Fuel efficiency is an important 
metric for an ‘improved stove’. If a stove system takes more biomass from the 
available supply then it consumes more fuel. That is reflected in an honest 
assessment of how much raw fuel is needed to operate the appliance. In a power 
station carbon losses (unburned fuel) are called ‘mechanical losses’. There are 
no special rules for losing carbon in ‘certain ways’. Fuel is fuel.

 

I hope that clarifies things a bit for you.

 

Regards
Crispin

 

_______________________________________________
Stoves mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
[email protected]

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/

Reply via email to