Dear AD

800,000,000 tons of Agricultural Waste is indeed a huge potential resource! How 
should it be handled to be of the highest possible value to the People of India?

Clearly:
* Some should be returned to the soil directly to improve soil organic matter
* Some should be composted, and added back to the soil
* Some should be converted to char for use as biochar
* Some should be converted to char for use as fuel
* Some should be used directly as fuel
* Some should be processed into pellets or briquettes for energy use
* Some should be used as animal feed
* Some should be incinerated simply to dispose of excess in the least costly 
manner
* Some should be used to make useful by-products
* Others....???

I would suggest that the People of India would get the greatest value for this 
potential resource if it was put to "diverse uses", rather than all being used 
for a single purpose. 

Best wishes,

Kevin


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Anand Karve 
  To: Discussion of biomass cooking stoves 
  Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 2:31 AM
  Subject: Re: [Stoves] planting trees ( the way I'd do it 1, 000, 000, 000 
years from now)


  Dear Stovers,
   We convert agricultural waste into charcoal by using a TLUD type of kiln and 
briquette the powdery char. In India, we produce annually about 800 million 
tons of agricultural waste, which can theoretically yield about 166 million 
tons of charcoal. There is no need to cut any trees for charcoal. 
  Yours
  A.D.Karve



  On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Cookswell Jikos <[email protected]> 
wrote:

    OK.... as discouraging as the facts may be, the facts are reality, and they 
must be dealt with to avoid future problems.
    1: Can different species be grown, that have higher Mean Annual Increments 
of growth?
    Yes - at least in East African drylands - the traditional colonial methods 
of silviculture were focused on high land pine and cypress plantations not 
indigenous dry land adapted trees. (which now provides the feedstock for more 
of Kenyas charcoal) Since 1994 we have been experimenting with different 
dryland planting and agronomic techniques (please see 
http://www.acts.or.ke/dmdocuments/PROJECT_REPORTS/PISCES_Sustainable_Charcoal.pdf
  pg. 7) and most of our findings so far have led us to belive that endimic 
tree species managed in a holistic and permacutrual manner produce coppiced 
'branch' charcoal with an excellent life cycle analysis profile. 


    2: Can the woodlots be managed better?
    I think there is always room for improvement in many fields, but I have 
definitely noticed more small and large farms in Kenya appling more of a 
conservation agriculture approach to land use planning. 


    3: Can cooking practises be changed?
    Yes - but with great difficulty. Imagine me coming from Kenya to tell your 
grandma that she's all wrong and vice versa... 


    What I have found though is that as people achieve higher incomes (and 
watch more TV) in East Africa cooking energy sources becomes more mixed and 
more specialized depending on the dish being cooked.  


    4: Would more efficient stoves help significantly?
    The Kenya Ceramic Jiko has been one of the most widely disseminated 
cookstoves in East Africa, on one hand, it saves users up to 50% on their 
charcoal bills compared to all metal non-insulated stoves. On the other hand, 
me and my father always wondered that if by making popularly stove that made it 
cheaper and easier to use charcoal coupled with population growth, did we not 
create more of a fuel dependency? This is why since the 1990's we have been 
advocating as much as possible to encourage all other stove makers to also 
think about provisions for reafforestation efforts. 




    5: Can other forms of fuel, or other sources of energy, be used to take 
some of the pressure off the woodlots?
    Please see this recently released quite amazing document from ICRAF 
http://www.slideshare.net/agroforestry/miyuki-iiyamaicrafcharcoal-review2013 
''What happend to the charcoal crisis?''


    Yes, but if as WWF has seen in Virunga, if people switch to fossil fuels, 
what happens when they are found under forests? And even solar cookers and 
microwaves may not help as much as if one takes into account the Life Cycle 
Analysis of the transport, computing power to design one etc... a 3 stone fire 
and growing your own trees start looking more attractive. 


    I am a great proponent of tree based biomass energy for at least people's 
sunday BBQ's ( which is a huge cause of charcoal us in Kenya!) due to the fact 
of all the other ecological trickledown effects. 


    6: Would some form of "Agroforestry" be possible, to put the land to a 
higher use, with multi-cropping?
    ...etc...


    yes we have tried food, fuel and fodder combinations to good effect in 
Kajiado - linear non-woodlot forestry is beginning to create more of an 
appearance in this area as land becomes adjudicated and title deeds issued. 
Land tenure is a huge obstacle to forestry in Kenya, this is why I personally 
am in favour of things like aerial seeding programs - if we some how grow too 
many trees, we will always be able to cut them down to cook with! 
https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.622109591163773.1073741929.199734683401268&type=1&l=0b605799ef


    Many thanks for your response. 


    Teddy 


    Cookswell Jikos
    www.cookswell.co.ke
    www.facebook.com/CookswellJikos
    www.kenyacharcoal.blogspot.com
    Mobile: +254 700 380 009 

    Mobile: +254 700 905 913
    P.O. Box 1433, Nairobi 00606, Kenya













    On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 5:15 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:

      Kevin and Stovers, 
          I am desperately wanting to farther study points 1,2,5 and 6. You got 
my attention buddy. Sorry, I don't have a 100 year old experiment to show you 
the results of my work. I do not do research papers because I'm an illiterate 
idiot. Many of you who have been on this list a while may remember- this letter 
will be a small record of the state of a sample of my research. Nobody has me 
asked this lately but you, Kevin. I'll probably die knowing and wanting to know 
way more than I can ever tell, if I talked the rest of my life. It just seems 
to bore everybody but some Biomass people. I miss you all out here alone 
trapped in the future. 
          My extensive experience with landscaping and gardening suggests we 
have only begun to barely scratch the surface of multicropping research. Mother 
Nature has done an amazing job of this, but we are not after the same goals as 
her. Typical natural forestry suggests that a 3 layer canopy is most efficent 
in biomass productive environments. As we push into less productive land, that 
will be different in both directions. . What each layer consists of for any 
given set of environmental conditions is has wide increasingly complex 
variables. Someday 100 years from now, a computer program will be crunching in 
whatever is the Cray Super Computer of that age. It will tell the then modern 
forester what works best- maybe. Then, only experiments to compare the real 
time data to to the computer model will fine tune the long term plan. 
          Modern complex forestry computer programs mostly focus on select 
harvest models. Computer planting programs just use current harvest data to 
optimise plantation - type management.  How do you get data on trees that take 
300 years or more to be fully mature?  Recent studies suggest that 1000 year 
old Redwoods are still increasing in biomass production over younger trees. Got 
1000 years to collect data?? Maybe we should be breeding many trees to grow 
1000 years. 
          If we make half the progress growing trees that we have made in a 
typical productive vegetable garden in 4000 or more years, you can throw out 
the predictions for production numbers. New numbers may be easily a power of 
ten more productive. Just look what small changes have brought us. When you 
consider the efficiency of photosynthisis to convert sunlight into chemical 
energy, that number theoreticlly can go two powers of ten or more. Not only do 
we need to first optimise growing technique, but then optimise breeding, and 
back to growing technique and so fourth. 
          I don't even want to consider pandoras box of geneticly modified 
plants. I think outer space is the best place to release them so they don't 
contaminate our biosphere like GM corn has. I considered that thought over 20 
years ago and it merged with my childhood idea of growing trees on the moon and 
on orbit.  That is why I've wanted to merge a greenhouse with a blacksmith 
shop. It's how space homesteads will do it. I discussed this issue at a 
hydroponics conference in the early 1990's and everybodys eyes rolled, so I 
just went out and worked on it with what I had. Nobody came to collect the 
amazing data I saw everyday for twenty years. A few years ago, my greenhouse 
was forced to close and my finacial situation has nearly halted all my 
research. I hope to slowly get back in the game if I don't loose my new 5 acre 
farm. It is Gods gift to me for my study. Most of the assets of this land are 
hidden and only of use to me. 
          Most of the forests today are being primarlily managed for lumber of 
some type. Hunting wildlife is about the only large second crop. Small private 
lands and prototype corporate plantations are where the experiments are being 
done. When we start to combine orchard and vegetable production with forestry, 
the sky is the limit. I take that back, how far has the Big Bang blown things 
open today? That is the limit. And this is how we will get out there if we do, 
over a billion years of future evolution and space travel. Call me crazy, but I 
saw a powerful vision as a child that told me this. You just keep moving the 
decimal point on the equation. Carl Sagan must have seen a vision like mine, 
and so I supported his work long ago. Most thought he was craazy too. Thanks 
Carl. 
          I have been blessed to spend a little time with one of the greatest 
foresters of our generation. John Guthrie of Wiggins Mississippi fame. My crash 
course in Southern USA forestry, shortly after Hurricane Katrina, taught me the 
following: The closer we get to understanding the original native environment, 
the better we can merge our needs to the use of the land given to us. 
          John would be first to tell you that if only a higher power can make 
a tree, who are we to decide how and where to grow it? That has led him to push 
the reintroduction of missing native tree species which have been eliminated 
one at a time. Grown in plantations to examine and focuse on each, longleaf 
pine is a good example. It was like the White Oak tree, the king of the forest, 
until it was logged nearly to extinction. Currently, burning of undergrowth is 
done like the Natives did for management in early stage plantations. Timing is 
everything. We had lively conversation about grazing and/ or underplanting of 
numerous shrub species to reduce this practice. I think I opened up his mind by 
the smile on his face. Some private plantations were doing this on a very basic 
experimental level in 2006. 
          The forest plot I was camped in, had longleaf pine being interplanted 
where select thining was being done to young Southern Yellow Pine, It was 
John"s land right behind the International Paper plant, so I think it was a 
prototype. The thinnings were going mostly to chip and saw for OSB and other 
products. The small thinings were hauled at harvest cost for pulp. Katrina 
opened it up more - as if God were saying to John " you got the idea boy, now 
go with it and I'll help yu". 
          Dr. Michler I belive is his name, discussed his work at Purdue U. 
with me about 10 years ago. At the time he was pioneering in the selecting of 3 
hardwood species: Red  Oak, Black Cherry, and Walnut. An Indiana nursery was 
selling the products of tissue culture of the best selected species. Breeding 
of hardwoods was still in it's infancy. The new science then was using gene 
mapping to select known genes to assist breeding of trees which were only 
starting to bear fruit. That is very exciting -more productive and safe than GM 
plants. I called because I wanted to know if anybody had studied growing trees 
to make charcoal fuel and he wondered what for.....  
          Kevin, I would like to add to your bucket list a huge compounding 
factor number 7.  What happens when we do all of the above, yet look at 
secondary and multiple layers of recycling of plants. For a great example you 
and I may have discussed the fact that Charcoal production for an industrial 
fuel may be the best utimate landfill killer. Demolition waste must be the 
largest growing filler of landfills. I have done limited research into which 
trees produce the best metallurgical charcoal. What happens when we breed trees 
for example, to both build houses, then reuse the wood to fuel a blast furnace 
to make the finest iron ever made?. The two uses are very compatible. Just so 
happens that some of the strongest hardwoods as well as pine species make real 
clean charcoal. The hardwoods make the most dense charcoal by nature. We can 
also infuse charcoal with additional hydrocarbons in the conversion process, 
with net energy production. If we grow walnut trees for example, we can produce 
food and many chemicals too at no additional cost. 
          Nearly every organic chemical can be coaxed from living material.  
Don't even get me started on the chemical refinery/production avenue. I've said 
enough. I cannot do much more or take time to record what I've found  out or 
can find out without a break in life somewhere. That is why I don't contribute 
much anymore to these lists. It gets me all excited, and then frustration sets 
in. I have 3 kids to raise and cannot waste my time playing with the future of 
mankind when I need food stamps. 
          Enough said. 


          Ok , do I have anybodies attention now???  
          I have to get off the computer so my Son can do his homework,  Sorry, 
no time for editing or additional info tonight. 
          
          Dan Dimiduk 
          Shangri- La Research. 


      In a message dated 11/13/2013 7:41:16 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
[email protected] writes:
        Dear RB

        OK.... as discouraging as the facts may be, the facts are reality, and 
they must be dealt with to avoid future problems.
        1: Can different species be grown, that have higher Mean Annual 
Increments of growth?
        2: Can the woodlots be managed better?
        3: Can cooking practises be changed?
        4: Would more efficient stoves help significantly?
        5: Can other forms of fuel, or other sources of energy, be used to take 
some of the pressure off the woodlots?
        6: Would some form of "Agroforestry" be possible, to put the land to a 
higher use, with multi-cropping?
        ...etc...

        Most people like to do things the way they have always been done. They 
can't expect different results if they do things the same way they have always 
done things in the past. The cruel facts are that if they want different 
results, then they will have to find changes that are acceptable to them, OR 
choose to live with the consequences of their present practises. Those seem to 
be the cruel realities.

        Best wishes,

        Kevin




      _______________________________________________
      Stoves mailing list

      to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
      [email protected]

      to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
      
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

      for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
      http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/






    _______________________________________________
    Stoves mailing list

    to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
    [email protected]

    to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
    
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

    for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
    http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/








  -- 
  ***
  Dr. A.D. Karve
  Trustee & Founder President, Appropriate Rural Technology Institute (ARTI)




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  Stoves mailing list

  to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
  [email protected]

  to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
  
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

  for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
  http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/

_______________________________________________
Stoves mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
[email protected]

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/

Reply via email to