Dear Kevin,
at least in my State (Maharashtra, India), there are some 150 factories
which compress agricultural waste into fuel briquettes. They pay farmers
Rs.2000 per ton (about US$33) for the agri-waste, so that the farmers
transport it at their own cost to the factory. Industries use these
briquettes as boiler fuel. Using biomass briquettes costs only 30% of what
one would pay for fuel oil.
Yours
A.D.Karve
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Kevin <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Dear AD
>
> 800,000,000 tons of Agricultural Waste is indeed a huge potential
> resource! How should it be handled to be of the highest possible value to
> the People of India?
>
> Clearly:
> * Some should be returned to the soil directly to improve soil organic
> matter
> * Some should be composted, and added back to the soil
> * Some should be converted to char for use as biochar
> * Some should be converted to char for use as fuel
> * Some should be used directly as fuel
> * Some should be processed into pellets or briquettes for energy use
> * Some should be used as animal feed
> * Some should be incinerated simply to dispose of excess in the least
> costly manner
> * Some should be used to make useful by-products
> * Others....???
>
> I would suggest that the People of India would get the greatest value for
> this potential resource if it was put to "diverse uses", rather than all
> being used for a single purpose.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Kevin
>
>
>
>  ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Anand Karve <[email protected]>
> *To:* Discussion of biomass cooking stoves<[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Friday, November 15, 2013 2:31 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [Stoves] planting trees ( the way I'd do it 1, 000, 000,
> 000 years from now)
>
> Dear Stovers,
>  We convert agricultural waste into charcoal by using a TLUD type of kiln
> and briquette the powdery char. In India, we produce annually about 800
> million tons of agricultural waste, which can theoretically yield about 166
> million tons of charcoal. There is no need to cut any trees for charcoal.
> Yours
> A.D.Karve
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Cookswell Jikos <[email protected]
> > wrote:
>
>>  OK.... as discouraging as the facts may be, the facts are reality, and
>> they must be dealt with to avoid future problems.
>> 1: Can different species be grown, that have higher Mean Annual
>> Increments of growth?
>> Yes - at least in East African drylands - the traditional colonial
>> methods of silviculture were focused on high land pine
>> and cypress plantations not indigenous dry land adapted trees. (which now
>> provides the feedstock for more of Kenyas charcoal) Since 1994 we have been
>> experimenting with different dryland planting and agronomic techniques
>> (please see
>> http://www.acts.or.ke/dmdocuments/PROJECT_REPORTS/PISCES_Sustainable_Charcoal.pdf
>>   pg.
>> 7) and most of our findings so far have led us to belive that endimic tree
>> species managed in a holistic and permacutrual manner produce coppiced
>> 'branch' charcoal with an excellent life cycle analysis profile.
>>
>> 2: Can the woodlots be managed better?
>> I think there is always room for improvement in many fields, but I
>> have definitely noticed more small and large farms in Kenya appling more of
>> a conservation agriculture approach to land use planning.
>>
>> 3: Can cooking practises be changed?
>> Yes - but with great difficulty. Imagine me coming from Kenya to tell
>> your grandma that she's all wrong and vice versa...
>>
>> What I have found though is that as people achieve higher incomes (and
>> watch more TV) in East Africa cooking energy sources becomes more mixed and
>> more specialized depending on the dish being cooked.
>>
>> 4: Would more efficient stoves help significantly?
>> The Kenya Ceramic Jiko has been one of the most widely disseminated
>> cookstoves in East Africa, on one hand, it saves users up to 50% on their
>> charcoal bills compared to all metal non-insulated stoves. On the other
>> hand, me and my father always wondered that if by making popularly stove
>> that made it cheaper and easier to use charcoal coupled
>> with population growth, did we not create more of a fuel dependency? This
>> is why since the 1990's we have been advocating as much as possible to
>> encourage all other stove makers to also think about provisions for
>> reafforestation efforts.
>>
>>
>> 5: Can other forms of fuel, or other sources of energy, be used to take
>> some of the pressure off the woodlots?
>> Please see this recently released quite amazing document from ICRAF
>> http://www.slideshare.net/agroforestry/miyuki-iiyamaicrafcharcoal-review2013 
>> ''What
>> happend to the charcoal crisis?''
>>
>> Yes, but if as WWF has seen in Virunga, if people switch to fossil fuels,
>> what happens when they are found under forests? And even solar cookers and
>> microwaves may not help as much as if one takes into account the Life Cycle
>> Analysis of the transport, computing power to design one etc... a 3 stone
>> fire and growing your own trees start looking more attractive.
>>
>> I am a great proponent of tree based biomass energy for at least people's
>> sunday BBQ's ( which is a huge cause of charcoal us in Kenya!) due to the
>> fact of all the other ecological trickledown effects.
>>
>> 6: Would some form of "Agroforestry" be possible, to put the land to a
>> higher use, with multi-cropping?
>> ...etc...
>>
>> yes we have tried food, fuel and fodder combinations to good effect in
>> Kajiado - linear non-woodlot forestry is beginning to create more of
>> an appearance in this area as land becomes adjudicated and title deeds
>> issued. Land tenure is a huge obstacle to forestry in Kenya, this is why
>> I personally am in favour of things like aerial seeding programs - if we
>> some how grow too many trees, we will always be able to cut them down to
>> cook with!
>> https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.622109591163773.1073741929.199734683401268&type=1&l=0b605799ef
>>
>> Many thanks for your response.
>>
>> Teddy
>>
>>  *Cookswell Jikos*
>> www.cookswell.co.ke
>> www.facebook.com/CookswellJikos
>> www.kenyacharcoal.blogspot.com
>> Mobile: +254 700 380 009
>> Mobile: +254 700 905 913
>> P.O. Box 1433, Nairobi 00606, Kenya
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 5:15 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>    Kevin and Stovers,
>>>     I am desperately wanting to farther study points 1,2,5 and 6. You
>>> got my attention buddy. Sorry, I don't have a 100 year old experiment to
>>> show you the results of my work. I do not do research papers because I'm an
>>> illiterate idiot. Many of you who have been on this list a while may
>>> remember- this letter will be a small record of the state of a sample of my
>>> research. Nobody has me asked this lately but you, Kevin. I'll probably die
>>> knowing and wanting to know way more than I can ever tell, if I talked the
>>> rest of my life. It just seems to bore everybody but some Biomass people. I
>>> miss you all out here alone trapped in the future.
>>>     My extensive experience with landscaping and gardening suggests we
>>> have only begun to barely scratch the surface of multicropping research.
>>> Mother Nature has done an amazing job of this, but we are not after the
>>> same goals as her. Typical natural forestry suggests that a 3 layer canopy
>>> is most efficent in biomass productive environments. As we push into less
>>> productive land, that will be different in both directions. . What each
>>> layer consists of for any given set of environmental conditions is has wide
>>> increasingly complex variables. Someday 100 years from now, a computer
>>> program will be crunching in whatever is the Cray Super Computer of that
>>> age. It will tell the then modern forester what works best- maybe. Then,
>>> only experiments to compare the real time data to to the computer model
>>> will fine tune the long term plan.
>>>     Modern complex forestry computer programs mostly focus on select
>>> harvest models. Computer planting programs just use current harvest data to
>>> optimise plantation - type management.  How do you get data on trees that
>>> take 300 years or more to be fully mature?  Recent studies suggest that
>>> 1000 year old Redwoods are still increasing in biomass production over
>>> younger trees. Got 1000 years to collect data?? Maybe we should be breeding
>>> many trees to grow 1000 years.
>>>     If we make half the progress growing trees that we have made in a
>>> typical productive vegetable garden in 4000 or more years, you can throw
>>> out the predictions for production numbers. New numbers may be easily a
>>> power of ten more productive. Just look what small changes have brought us.
>>> When you consider the efficiency of photosynthisis to convert sunlight into
>>> chemical energy, that number theoreticlly can go two powers of ten or more.
>>> Not only do we need to first optimise growing technique, but then optimise
>>> breeding, and back to growing technique and so fourth.
>>>     I don't even want to consider pandoras box of geneticly modified
>>> plants. I think outer space is the best place to release them so they don't
>>> contaminate our biosphere like GM corn has. I considered that thought over
>>> 20 years ago and it merged with my childhood idea of growing trees on the
>>> moon and on orbit.  That is why I've wanted to merge a greenhouse with a
>>> blacksmith shop. It's how space homesteads will do it. I discussed this
>>> issue at a hydroponics conference in the early 1990's and everybodys eyes
>>> rolled, so I just went out and worked on it with what I had. Nobody came to
>>> collect the amazing data I saw everyday for twenty years. A few years ago,
>>> my greenhouse was forced to close and my finacial situation has nearly
>>> halted all my research. I hope to slowly get back in the game if I don't
>>> loose my new 5 acre farm. It is Gods gift to me for my study. Most of the
>>> assets of this land are hidden and only of use to me.
>>>     Most of the forests today are being primarlily managed for lumber of
>>> some type. Hunting wildlife is about the only large second crop. Small
>>> private lands and prototype corporate plantations are where the experiments
>>> are being done. When we start to combine orchard and vegetable production
>>> with forestry, the sky is the limit. I take that back, how far has the Big
>>> Bang blown things open today? That is the limit. And this is how we will
>>> get out there if we do, over a billion years of future evolution and space
>>> travel. Call me crazy, but I saw a powerful vision as a child that told me
>>> this. You just keep moving the decimal point on the equation. Carl Sagan
>>> must have seen a vision like mine, and so I supported his work long ago.
>>> Most thought he was craazy too. Thanks Carl.
>>>     I have been blessed to spend a little time with one of the greatest
>>> foresters of our generation. John Guthrie of Wiggins Mississippi fame. My
>>> crash course in Southern USA forestry, shortly after Hurricane Katrina,
>>> taught me the following: The closer we get to understanding the original
>>> native environment, the better we can merge our needs to the use of the
>>> land given to us.
>>>     John would be first to tell you that if only a higher power can make
>>> a tree, who are we to decide how and where to grow it? That has led him to
>>> push the reintroduction of missing native tree species which have been
>>> eliminated one at a time. Grown in plantations to examine and focuse on
>>> each, longleaf pine is a good example. It was like the White Oak tree, the
>>> king of the forest, until it was logged nearly to extinction. Currently,
>>> burning of undergrowth is done like the Natives did for management in early
>>> stage plantations. Timing is everything. We had lively conversation about
>>> grazing and/ or underplanting of numerous shrub species to reduce this
>>> practice. I think I opened up his mind by the smile on his face. Some
>>> private plantations were doing this on a very basic experimental level in
>>> 2006.
>>>     The forest plot I was camped in, had longleaf pine being
>>> interplanted where select thining was being done to young Southern Yellow
>>> Pine, It was John"s land right behind the International Paper plant, so I
>>> think it was a prototype. The thinnings were going mostly to chip and saw
>>> for OSB and other products. The small thinings were hauled at harvest cost
>>> for pulp. Katrina opened it up more - as if God were saying to John " you
>>> got the idea boy, now go with it and I'll help yu".
>>>     Dr. Michler I belive is his name, discussed his work at Purdue U.
>>> with me about 10 years ago. At the time he was pioneering in the selecting
>>> of 3 hardwood species: Red  Oak, Black Cherry, and Walnut. An Indiana
>>> nursery was selling the products of tissue culture of the best selected
>>> species. Breeding of hardwoods was still in it's infancy. The new science
>>> then was using gene mapping to select known genes to assist breeding of
>>> trees which were only starting to bear fruit. That is very exciting -more
>>> productive and safe than GM plants. I called because I wanted to know if
>>> anybody had studied growing trees to make charcoal fuel and he wondered
>>> what for.....
>>>     Kevin, I would like to add to your bucket list a huge compounding
>>> factor number 7.  What happens when we do all of the above, yet look at
>>> secondary and multiple layers of recycling of plants. For a great example
>>> you and I may have discussed the fact that Charcoal production for an
>>> industrial fuel may be the best utimate landfill killer. Demolition waste
>>> must be the largest growing filler of landfills. I have done limited
>>> research into which trees produce the best metallurgical charcoal. What
>>> happens when we breed trees for example, to both build houses, then reuse
>>> the wood to fuel a blast furnace to make the finest iron ever made?. The
>>> two uses are very compatible. Just so happens that some of the strongest
>>> hardwoods as well as pine species make real clean charcoal. The hardwoods
>>> make the most dense charcoal by nature. We can also infuse charcoal with
>>> additional hydrocarbons in the conversion process, with net energy
>>> production. If we grow walnut trees for example, we can produce food and
>>> many chemicals too at no additional cost.
>>>     Nearly every organic chemical can be coaxed from living material.
>>> Don't even get me started on the chemical refinery/production avenue. I've
>>> said enough. I cannot do much more or take time to record what I've found
>>>  out or can find out without a break in life somewhere. That is why I don't
>>> contribute much anymore to these lists. It gets me all excited, and then
>>> frustration sets in. I have 3 kids to raise and cannot waste my time
>>> playing with the future of mankind when I need food stamps.
>>>     Enough said.
>>>
>>>
>>>     Ok , do I have anybodies attention now???
>>>     I have to get off the computer so my Son can do his homework,
>>> Sorry, no time for editing or additional info tonight.
>>>
>>>     Dan Dimiduk
>>>     Shangri- La Research.
>>>
>>>
>>> In a message dated 11/13/2013 7:41:16 AM Eastern Standard Time,
>>> [email protected] writes:
>>>
>>> Dear RB
>>>
>>> OK.... as discouraging as the facts may be, the facts are reality, and
>>> they must be dealt with to avoid future problems.
>>> 1: Can different species be grown, that have higher Mean Annual
>>> Increments of growth?
>>> 2: Can the woodlots be managed better?
>>> 3: Can cooking practises be changed?
>>> 4: Would more efficient stoves help significantly?
>>> 5: Can other forms of fuel, or other sources of energy, be used to take
>>> some of the pressure off the woodlots?
>>> 6: Would some form of "Agroforestry" be possible, to put the land to a
>>> higher use, with multi-cropping?
>>> ...etc...
>>>
>>> Most people like to do things the way they have always been done. They
>>> can't expect different results if they do things the same way they have
>>> always done things in the past. The cruel facts are that if they want
>>> different results, then they will have to find changes that are acceptable
>>> to them, OR choose to live with the consequences of their present
>>> practises. Those seem to be the cruel realities.
>>>
>>> Best wishes,
>>>
>>> Kevin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Stoves mailing list
>>>
>>> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
>>>
>>> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org
>>>
>>> for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
>>> http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Stoves mailing list
>>
>> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
>> [email protected]
>>
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
>>
>> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org
>>
>> for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
>> http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> ***
> Dr. A.D. Karve
> Trustee & Founder President, Appropriate Rural Technology Institute (ARTI)
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Stoves mailing list
>
> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
> [email protected]
>
> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
>
> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org
>
> for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
> http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Stoves mailing list
>
> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
> [email protected]
>
> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
>
> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org
>
> for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
> http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/
>
>
>


-- 
***
Dr. A.D. Karve
Trustee & Founder President, Appropriate Rural Technology Institute (ARTI)
_______________________________________________
Stoves mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
[email protected]

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/

Reply via email to