Complaint goes to Saint Paul Police
http://www.twincities.com/mld/twincities/news/local/7295329.htm

Plus

Below is a excerpt from the Villager, November 19, page 6.  Sorry, no
web link.

"If the reaction of Finney and the NAACP to a live, off--the-cuff
comment was excessive, the reaction of Ward 5 City Council candidate
Kris Reiter and her campaign manager, Ramsey County Sheriff Bob
Fletcher, to the reading of the Infamous Question at a candidate forum
was downright aberrant. (And no, on the advice of our attorney, I won't
be the first publisher in town to print the Infamous Question.  The
likelihood of a libel lawsuit is great enough, the cost of defending
this newspaper high enough, and the turth of the asssertion iffy enough,
that it's not worth it.)

The infamous Question would have been nothing more than a footnote in a
remarkable election - and grist for the Rice Street rumor mill - had
Fletcher not demanded for evidentiary purposes all of the cards from
which the questions at the forum had been read and then threatened to
sue the League of Women Voters and the North End News, the sponsors of
the forum.  Reiter has since indicated that she may follow suit.

Let's set aside the question of whether an elected county sheriff should
ever serve as a campaign chairman for a candidate running for office in
the same county.  Let's set aside, too, the question of whether a county
sheriff is acting as a campaign chairman or abusing his power as a law
enforcement officer in launching an investigation into the identity of
the author of the Infamous Question.

What Fletcher and Reiter should not set aside is the fact that the
Infamous Question will be fair game for every media outlet in the Twin
Cities should the matter go to court.  In their own interest, they'd be
wise to stop this silliness now."

Congratulations to the Villager for raising some of the very important
questions which need to be raised.  But the questions I would really
love to see additional discussion about are the ones the Villager raised
but chose not to address.

Should an elected county sheriff should ever serve as a campaign
chairman for a candidate running for office in the same county?

Was the county sheriff acting as a campaign chairman or abusing his
power as a law enforcement officer in launching an investigation into
the identity of the author of the Infamous Question?

And there are some added questions which need to be considered.  The
Villager has put in print what many of us believed all along, the threat
of a lawsuit is preventing them from printing something which has
clearly become news, even though it might not have been news at the
time.  Where are the defenders of the free press now?  I think I know
that answer.  The big guys with the enough bucks to actually take this
thing to court are not willing to admit that they did and are pulling a
punch here.  For them to take this to court now would be to say out
loud, "It was news and it was fit to print (or broadcast) but we were
(and are) just too scared."  And just what else are they afraid to
print?  How big a bully do they need to be facing to say, "Gee, maybe
this is just not worth it."

Is failing to exert their right to publish a slippery slope?  Only time
will tell.  No, we are not facing tanks in the square.   I would compare
it to a rat eating through the covering on the electric wire.  A little
bite at a time, slowly the damage is done, then the light goes out.



--
Jeanne Weigum
651-646-3005
fax 651-646-0142



NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Stpaul mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

Reply via email to