Index of SPPS Budget Discussion
http://www.e-democracy.org/stpaul/spps-posts.html
_________________________________________


My name is Brian Joyce and I have served on the Ramsey Jr. High Site Council and 
attended other site meetings.
Site Councils can and at many of our schools do play a very important role in budget 
discussions. Principals who want and understand the advantage of shared decision 
making find working with Site Councils a lot of work but very worth while.
The major issues Sites deal with now is staffing and supplies. The average site in 
St.Paul spends 94 to 96 percent of their budget on people and benefits. Some are at 
99%. This means a cut of any size means a persons job is cut. This has been teachers 
aids, nurses, librarians, teachers, councilors and custodians. It has meant cutting 
back on technology upgrades, cutting back on copying services and of course very 
little money to try anything new.
I would recommend getting into a site council if you think schools waste money. Work 
on a few SCIP plans and talk with all the different people who work to make the 
education of our children happen. I have found it an eye opening and very informative 
process. As a Site Council member and Co-Chair I walked the schools halls, watched 
classes, talked with students, custodians, teachers, councilors, asst. principals, 
area superintendents and parents. I found the majority liked their school and it's 
staff but who always saw opportunities for improvement. Education is not an easy or an 
inexpensive proposition. To have a first hand say with the person who makes all the 
final decisions for their site (the principal) I think being part of a Site Council is 
very worth while.

       Brian Joyce
      The West Side
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: List Manager<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
  To: St. Paul Issues Forum<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
  Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 11:34 AM
  Subject: Re: [StPaul] SPPS: Site Councils


  NEAT - info about SPPS budget:
  http://tinyurl.com/3gt66<http://tinyurl.com/3gt66>
  _________________________________________
   
   
  Posted With Permission For Roger Barr:
  --------------------------------------

  I have served on two site councils, advised numerous councils, and 
  helped the Office of Leadership Development create best practices 
  that are used by many site councils in the St. Paul Public Schools. 
  Like all education/budget issues, the answer(s) to this question is 
  more complex than we would like it to be.

  First, it is necessary to understand that a school operates with 
  funds it controls as well as funds that are administered by central 
  office.  District wide, sites (or schools) see about 49 percent of 
  the total budget, while central office administers 51 percent.  Most 
  of that 51 percent funds programs or costs that go directly to 
  schools, such as food service, transportation, nurses, special ed. 
  teachers and the like.  The list of district funding responsibilities 
  is extensive.

  In contrast, most of the (district average) 49 percent that schools 
  have direct control over goes to funding staff. The site also has 
  revenue for non staff costs for supplies and so on.  Again, the list 
  of possible funding responsibilities at the school level is extensive.

  When schools develop their SCIP or strategic plan, their plan uses 
  resources (staff and non-staff) allocated directly to the school, as 
  well as resources (staff and non staff) administered by the central 
  office.  Not surprisingly, most schools approach the planning/budget 
  process from this perspective:  Do we have enough revenue from all 
  sources to "cover" our current programs next year?  Adjustments are 
  made to programs in accordance to what revenues are 
  available--tempered by parental input/influence and district 
  oversight.

  With dollars tightening and performance expectations on the rise, 
  this old method of planning is being replaced by data driven 
  decision making.  More and more, schools are expected to review 
  performance data and plan based on research, as opposed to tradition 
  or preference.  You will hear data driven decision making applauded 
  and criticized.

  Now, here is how site councils fit into the picture.  According to 
  district policy, the site council's role is to "approve and monitor" 
  the SCIP, or School Continuous Improvement Plan, which until this 
  year included the budget.  The site council's role isn't necessarily 
  to CREATE the SCIP and budget, only to approve and monitor it.  Some 
  school site councils take a very active role in the development of 
  the SCIP/budget.  Site council members serve on committees that make 
  recommendations or even draft portions of the SCIP document. The 
  principal presents the SCIP to the site council for its review and 
  approval.  It is not uncommon for debate to result in modifications 
  to the plan before it is approved by the site council and forwarded 
  to the district's accountability office for compliance review.

  It is also district policy that the principal has the final authority 
  (and the legal accountability) in a building and can overrule the 
  recommendations of the site council. In truth, some principals 
  maintain tight control over the SCIP/budget process.  In such 
  schools, the role of the site council "to approve and monitor" can be 
  diminished to what some frustrated members call a "rubber stamp."

  Most site councils lie somewhere in-between the two poles of very 
  high involvement/influence and very minimal involvement /influence in 
  the planning and budgeting process. In general, in my seven years of 
  hanging around site councils, I have seen marked improvement in the 
  involvement and influence of site councils (read, teachers, staff, 
  parents, community members, students) in the planning and budgeting 
  process in our schools. Overall, the focus in the relationship 
  between site councils and principals is shifting, sometimes slowly, 
  from "Who gets to make the decision?" to "How do we make a good 
  decision?"

  We still have a ways to go in developing an influential site council 
  at every school.  This is not simply because principals dominate the 
  process.  There is a fairly sharp learning curve associated with 
  being a knowledgeable and effective site council member.  Site 
  council members move through the system with their children.  Thus a 
  site council can be strong one year, and back to square one the next 
  as its leadership and skilled members "graduate" with their students.

  The St. Paul Public Schools is working hard to train principals to 
  work collaboratively with their school communities in the planning 
  process. These efforts have been, are, and must be in the future 
  matched with similar efforts to prepare staff and especially parents 
  to assume active and constructive roles as site council members.

  Parents interested in joining the site council at their school should 
  contact their school office and ask for the names of the site council 
  chairs.  It is also possible for community members to join site 
  councils even though they do not have students in the school.  My 
  organization, Support Our Schools, has helped schools find community 
  members, and also helped community members find a school site council 
  to join.  Community members who are interested in joining a site 
  council are welcome to contact me.

  Roger Barr
  Support Our Schools
  10 River Park Plaza
  St. Paul, MN 55107
  651-603-8858
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  _____________________________________________
  SPPS Budget Reduction Forum - Feb. 23-27
  Co-Sponsored By NEAT: http://www.stpaulneat.org/<http://www.stpaulneat.org/>
  _____________________________________________
  NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

  To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
  
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul<http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul>

  Archive Address:
     
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/<http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/>
_____________________________________________
SPPS Budget Reduction Forum - Feb. 23-27
Co-Sponsored By NEAT: http://www.stpaulneat.org/
_____________________________________________
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

Archive Address:
   http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/

Reply via email to