--------------------------------------------------
   REMINDER: Only 2 Posts Per Day Per Person
--------------------------------------------------


I concur - ban smoking, dump WalMart; local control in St Paul, not in
various corporate headquarters.

I share popman's view of capitalism.

He has a variant, "crapitalism".

This emphasizes C as a (very) brown field.

He has overlooked other possibilities:

  clapitalism - C as a social disease

  chapitalism - C practiced by Brits; a skin sore; both together

  cwapitalism - Elmer Fudd's version of C


--David Shove
roseville


On Wed, 12 May 2004, popman wrote:

> Smoking Ban? You Betcha!
>
>
>
> Long have I argued against the word: "Freedom" or any
> of it's variants, i.e.: free speech. Simply because it
> doesn't exist.
>
> Of course, governments are there to govern. What that
> really means is that it rations out the so-called
> "freedoms".
>
> You have no "rights" either. The police can stop you
> from going to the polls, therefore, you have no "right
> to vote". Many Floridians faced this in the last
> presidential election.
>
>
> Freedoms are, what amounts to a privilege to smoke,
> until the public denies said privilege.
>
>
> Tim Erickson is wrong when he says that this group is
> about issues and not about each other for the same
> reasons it's not about government. It's an idea that
> really should be banned along with smoking.
>
> It's not about issues, it's about people and moreover,
> it's about the people who run / ruin government. It's
> about time that we starting calling it �like it is.
> It's really a war between common sense, correct people
> and the evil capitalists.
> It's time to start naming names and pointing fingers.
> It's time to draw the line in the sand and get it on.
> Government is a great thing, unfortunately, most of
> the people who run it aren't so great� anymore, with
> exceptions like John Marty of Roseville.
>
> When it comes to a smoking ban, our leaders shouldn't,
> with the mountain of evidence available, shouldn't
> think twice about banishment of the cigarette in any
> place, including one's own home. They should ban
> cigarettes state-wide. We do it with fireworks, so why
> not cigarettes? I know that the naysayers will whine:
> "but you still see and hear them on the 4th of July.
> See�you can't banned things."
>
> My answer is that you wouldn't hear 'em if the
> government was allowed to do it's job without the
> accompanying duty to promote crapitalism. We do a
> pretty damm good job with child pornography. We banned
> public bath houses. See any of them around the city?
> Incidentally, weren't they banned for health reasons
> as was the stated case against fireworks? Isn't that
> the same premise being used to ban smoking??? If your
> going to demand a privilege to smoke, then by the same
> stroke of the gubernatorial pen, open the bath houses
> too! Let's have some consistency here.
>
> In other countries, things are routinely "banned". For
> example, in Europe, U.S. meat is banned! It's not
> allowed simply because it's a health hazard. Results:
> Europeans don�t ingest cancer causing meat imported
> from the U.S. They live just as long and their quality
> of life is much better than ours.Same was done with
> the idea of drinking and driving. In other countries,
> you don't drink and drive, period.
> Can the government stop you from drinking and driving?
> If they did it right, the government could stop it
> cold in it's tracks, but when well intention "correct"
> people start to do so, up pops the evil of capitalism
> and thusly, compromises common sense and ruins the
> day.
>
>
>
> The government job IS to protect us, not from
> ourselves, but from overwhelming crapitalistic
> interests taking advantage of us in the marketplace.
> We shouldn't have to compromise our health for the
> sake of crapitalistic interests. If we have one and
> only one "right", it should be: Our own health without
> CAPITALISTIC INTERFERENCE!
>
> There are a lot of other things that should be banned
> simply because it's no damm good for you: U.S. meat,
> Wal-Mart, McDonalds, the forty hour workweek,
> religion, corporate unions and competitive
> professional sports. The list goes on and in the end,
> we will find the best thing we can do for ourselves is
> to ban, the root of all this evil: capitalism.
>
> We should be in the streets DEMANDING that our health
> and welfare be taken out of the hands of the ever
> intrusive and exploitative capitalists!
>
>
>
> R. Hanson.
> A reasonable voice in St. Paul.
>
_____________________________________________
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

Archive Address:
   http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/

Reply via email to