Two excerpted articles from today's NY Times.  In response to the first--
will R.J. Reynolds bring their "Roaring Twenties" campaign here?  (in
keeping with our gangster past)  And in response to the second--will St.
Paul sell "fire safe" cigarettes here?

Elizabeth Dickinson
West Side


Selling Health or Hedonism in a World of No Smoking

July 7, 2004
 By NAT IVES 

R. J. Reynolds Tobacco has begun selling Camel cigarettes
by harking back to the Prohibition era, with a "Roaring
2000's" tour that will include "speakeasy events" this
summer around the country. By contrast, Brown & Williamson
is test-marketing its Advance brand of cigarettes in
Phoenix with a blunt appeal to health-conscious smokers:
"Great taste - less toxins."

*********************************************************

But current R. J. Reynolds executives insisted that the
speakeasy images were not meant to compare modern smoking
restrictions to the national alcohol ban that lasted from
1920 to 1933, when it fell because of intense popular
pressure. 

"It's reminiscent of an era in American history where
people enjoyed the pleasure of smoking," said Ellen
Wallace, manager for corporate communications at R. J.
Reynolds Tobacco in Winston-Salem, N.C.

*********************************************************
"There was a time when it was socially fashionable," Mr.
Stewart said of smoking. "To the extent that there is an
element of nostalgia, people wanting to revert back to the
good old days, that may have an appeal."
**********************************************************

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/07/business/media/07adco.html?ex=1090205879&e
i=1&en=79e7f1818e01b334

Where There's Smoke and No Fire

July 7, 2004

Now the State of New York is coming up with another smoking
challenge: cigarettes that can snuff themselves if smokers
don't keep puffing. Beginning this week, cigarettes sold in
the state are required to be "fire-safe," which means that
each cigarette must be wrapped in thin paper with two bands
along its length that are supposed to inhibit burning.

Smokers may believe that this is being done to torment them
further, but the risk of fire from cigarettes is real. They
are the leading cause of fatal residential fires
nationwide, killing some 1,000 people every year. About a
dozen other states are considering versions of the New York
law. 

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/07/opinion/07WED4.html?ex=1090206354&ei=1&en=
3697775f44522f0b



_____________________________________________
To Join:   St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

_____________________________________________
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

Archive Address:
   http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/

Reply via email to