--------------------------------------------------------------
 Just a reminder!  Absolutely no more than two posts per day.
 --------------------------------------------------------------
> [Original Message]
> From: Tom & Elsa Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Guy Western called one side asking a question "wondering"

Umm, 'cuz that's kinda WHAT HE SAID.
<BobT wrote:> "When I saw this, I wondered if her exposure to second 
hand smoke in bars may have had something to do with it."

> and another side asking questions "innuendo".

And that's because another side didn't contribute any facts whatsoever.

I repeat, the only facts here are those contributed by Mr. Treumann: 
Julitta McFarlane earned her living working in bars and restaurants and
died tragically young of heart disease which is a proven consequence of
exposure to second hand smoke.

Unless and until someone contributes any additional facts, those are all we
have to apply our common sense to.  Insinuating a lot of ideological
assumptions in response does nothing but cloud the discussion in lieu of
any real contribution.

- Guy Western
the West Side

> [Original Message]
> From: Tom & Elsa Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: stpaul forum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 7/11/04 7:44:32 PM
> Subject: [StPaul] re: Singers death and smoking ban?
>
> "Mr. Treumann was just wondering.  I don't think that betrays any
ingrained
> ideology.  If Mr. Thompson wants to address these other questions, perhaps
> he could find out something factual about them for all of us instead
> introducing them as innuendo."
>
>
> Maybe Mr Treumann could have found out the facts before "wondering", just
as I could have before I introduced "innuendo".   However, I don't see an
admonishment of his statement.  Engrained ideology?  Seems both of us asked
questions, however, you only questioned one side.  Guy Western called one
side asking a question "wondering" and another side asking questions
"innuendo".  That enhances my point on engrained ideology better than I
could.  Thank you.
>
> Tom Thompson
> Como Park
>
> Wondering when common sense will come back to St Paul
>
>
>
> Original message:
>
> > [Original Message]
> > From: Tom & Elsa Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> <BobT wrote:> "When I saw this, I wondered if her exposure to
> > second hand smoke in bars may have had something to do with it."
> >
> > > Shows the engrained ideology; what about her eating habits, was she
> > > obese, was she prone genetically, was she just plain unlucky?
>
> Mr. Treumann was just wondering.  I don't think that betrays any ingrained
> ideology.  If Mr. Thompson wants to address these other questions, perhaps
> he could find out something factual about them for all of us instead
> introducing them as innuendo.  After all, that's the reason we like to
have
> "both sides" of any argument represented here.  Pertinent facts are one
> thing, but I have some moral qualms about making unfounded insinuations
> about the deceased.
>
> The *fact* remains, Julitta MacFarlane earned her living as a bar &
> restaurant employee and she died tragically of heart disease at a very
> early age.  It's an on-point, local example of the very same and specific
> reason that Councilman Thune raised this issue in the City Council.
>
> > Not that I have any love for the owners of bars, bars and alcohol have
> > caused more misery than smoking every will.  However, remember this
> > slippery slope.  First it was guns and lawsuits against manufacturers,
> > then cigarettes, now bars, what's next?  McDonalds, Burger King? 
> > Already under way.  And we wonder why the cost of products is
> > going up so fast.
>
> Safe products cost more than unsafe products.  Safe workplaces cost more
> than unsafe ones.  It's the reason that rampant free-marketeering is
> unacceptable.  If the utopian free market were permitted to regulate
itself
> in this respect, those consumers who select cheaper, unsafe products would
> eventually die off, thereby reducing the demand for unsafe products and
> selecting in favor of safe products.  Great for the bargain hunters who
> survive!  The free market has healed itself, but at the cost of
> significantly reduced population.  The trouble is, the market only regards
> death as a reduction in the demand side which produces downward pressure
on
> prices.  I don't have any resentments against bar & restaurant owners,
it's
> just that it takes humane influences to regulate the free market to truly
> serve human needs.  Adam Smith himself acknowledged that in his *other*
> book, "The Theory of Moral Sentiments". 
>
> The optimal way to introduce humane regulation into the market is to do it
> in such a way as to maintain a level playing field for competing small
> businesses.  That's why I'm bending over backwards to give Mayor Kelly the
> benefit of the doubt in bringing about the promised regional solution.  
>
> Guy Western
> tapping my foot on the West Side
> _____________________________________________
> To Join:   St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
> Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>
> _____________________________________________
> NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  
> To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
> http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul
>
> Archive Address:
>    http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/


_____________________________________________
To Join:   St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

_____________________________________________
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

Archive Address:
   http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/

Reply via email to