Yes I would like to see light rail on University. I know very little about transit issues but have never been able to figure out the Hiawatha Route. I understand it's been in the works a long time but still don't understand why there. In my unexperienced opinion, a lot more working people who need mass transit would be able to benefit on University but I am also aware that it would be quite the project!

Michelle Hoffman
West Side
On Aug 12, 2004, at 3:56 PM, Haudy Kazemi wrote:

Here is the vote total so far. However, the totals themselves are
distorted by the fact that some people didn't like the question and
didn't respond. Some folks voted YES, but then said "NO" to a
University route.

What was really interesting, was reading the explanations that people
gave - I plan to summarize in a few minutes.

I'll continue to take votes/summaries the rest of today. If your
first post was too long, you may send me (privately) a shorter
version (150 words or less), for the final INFORMAL summary of the
discussion. I'll re-post all of the answers tomorrow.

(Next time, I'll add an UNDECIDED option to the list of possible
responses).

================================================= Post your votes to either: [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR [EMAIL PROTECTED] ================================================= 1) Based on what you know today, would you like to see a light rail system built in St. Paul ALONG - University Ave. (similar to the Hiawatha corridor system)?

               YES     or      NO

    Optional: short explanation of vote (or caveat).
              150 words or less
================================================

Vote: 'no'

Explanation:

My vote is a conditional 'no'. I don't support the a Hiawatha style LRT on
or above the surface of University Avenue. Underground it would be okay
(i.e. a 'yes' vote for underground via tunneling or 'cut and cover').


However, I think that better than a Hiawatha style LRT would be a PRT
system (Personal Rapid Transit such as Taxi2000/Skywebexpress
http://www.skywebexpress.com/ ).  I give a 'yes' to a PRT system like
these.

The build and operating cost projections for PRT are better than for LRT...
http://www.skywebexpress.com/130b_comparisons.shtml
http://www.skywebexpress.com/130a_comparisons.shtml


Disclaimer: I am in no way affiliated with SkyWeb Express other than being
a person interested in their design. Some anti-PRT pro-LRT folks have this
site:
http://www.lightrailnow.org/facts/fa_prt001.htm and related pages:
http://www.lightrailnow.org/facts/fa_monorail.htm
http://www.lightrailnow.org/facts/fa_monorail004.htm (LRT Projects costs
are on that page)




_____________________________________________
To Join:   St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_____________________________________________
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

Archive Address:
   http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/


_____________________________________________
To Join: St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_____________________________________________
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

Archive Address:
  http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/

Reply via email to