In a message dated 9/14/2004 6:05:00 PM Eastern Daylight Time, "Bruce Leier" <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]> writes:

>Well Dave,
>
>Party registration, IMHO, clearly results in lower quality candidates. �It makes it 
>much harder to work with 3rd party candidates. �Party registration is clearly 
>anti-democratic and seems to be supported by the "hacks" lol
>Chuck. �It is designed to keep the "unwashed" independent thinker from messing with 
>"their party.
>
>Responsively yours,
>Bruce Leier
>

One last thought on this and then I will let it rest.  The point of a political party 
is an association of reasonably like minded individuals who desire to elect someone of 
their choice to public office.  The point of party registration is to have citizens 
who desire to join that association of reasonably like minded individuals do so in 
advance of an election so that the party has the ability to communicate directly with 
them (find out who has joined their association of reasonably like minded 
individuals).  

As an association of reasonably like minded individuals, one would think that they 
would have the right to put forward the candidate of their choice, the choice of JUST 
the members of the association of reasonably like minded individuals, or at least 
those who agree to be a member of the association of reasonably like minded 
individuals.

Those who oppose party registration in effect are saying "I should have the right to 
decide who should represent your association of reasonably like minded individuals, 
even if I am not a member and don't like any of you who are members of this 
association of reasonably like minded individuals."  "If my participating in your 
internal election damages your association, and puts forwards candidates who do not 
represent the values of your association of reasonably like minded individuals, who 
cares?"  (Kind of like I want to vote for who is president of the Chamber of Commerce 
without paying membership dues.) 

The effect in Minnesota is very weak political parties.  Elections dominated by 
candidates who can raise money outside the party and the ability for some candidates 
to switch political parties without missing a beat.  The public then ends up with 
parties that are meaningless and the old grassroots campaigning with volunteers who 
worked because the believed in the association of reasonably like minded individuals 
they belonged to being replaced by paid phone banks of out of state callers.

JMONTOMEPPOF

Chuck Repke
_____________________________________________
To Join:   St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

_____________________________________________
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

Archive Address:
   http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/

Reply via email to