As promised - a little more info on transit in the W 7th corridor (in the
context of regional plans).

The Met Council is currently updating its 2030 Transportation Policy Plan.
Other staff at my organization have reviewed the document closely and have
pointed me to a section (Chapter 4) that identifies the priorities for
expanded transit in the Twin Cities for the next 25 years.  (Other sections
of the plan deal with road and funding issues, among other things.)

Riverview Corridor (i.e. the W. 7th corridor) is not in their First or
Second Tier of priorities - and as a result is unlikely to come to pass for
a generation or two. (It will be hard enough to get the "prioritized"
projects completed in the next 25 years given current funding limits.)  Thus
the only transit changes along W 7th in the current plan would be the result
of planned increases and expansion of regular bus service and express bus
service (provided funding increases are approved by the legislature &
governor).

As you can see only 1 of the top 5 priority projects includes St. Paul, and
2 of the 3 second tier projects include St. Paul

First Tier Priorities: 
Northstar Commuter Rail (planning underway)
Northwest Busway (construction underway through NW Mpls & suburbs)
Cedar Ave Busway (from Mall Of America through Apple Valley & Lakeville)
I-35W Bus Rapid Transit (Bloomington all the way into Downtown Mpls)
Central Corridor (bus or rail along University Ave between St. Paul & Mpls)

Second Tier Priorities:
Southwest Corridor ( bus or rail from Mpls to Eden Prarie)
Rush Line (Commuter Rail or Bus from St. Paul to Hinkley)
Red Rock (Commuter Rail or Bus from Mpls through St. Paul to Hastings)

October 22 is the last day to comment on the Met Council's draft plan - see
the document at:
http://www.metrocouncil.org/planning/transportation/TPP/2004/summary.htm  

See Transit for Livable Communities' comments on the plan at: 
http://www.tlcminnesota.org/TranspoAndLandUse/TPP_Comment_Ltr.htm

The Riverview Corridor had a website but that website isn't functioning at
this time ( try http://www.riverviewcorridor.org/ )

Of course, the entire plan could change with a different governor &
administration since the governor effectively dictates regional priorities
by appointing the Met Council.  Nonetheless, this is the direction current
state policy is pointing St. Paul & the region.

Kevin Somdahl Sands - Administrator - Transit for Livable Communities
Phone: 651-767-0298  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 12:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Stpaul Digest, Vol 10, Issue 27

Send Stpaul mailing list submissions to
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Stpaul digest..."


-------------------------------------------------
 Please - Take the St. Paul Job Shadow Survey 
              Just 15 Questions:  
 http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=70658501784
-------------------------------------------------
 


Today's Topics:

   1. RE: Bataglia Implodes on KSTP ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
   2. Re: W7th Bus Way marches on - NOT SO (Chris Boylan)
   3. Re: Semi's are prohibited on 35E (Chris Boylan)
   4. Re: Semi's are prohibited on 35E ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
   5. Re: Semi's are prohibited on 35E (Dan Dobson)
   6. Re: Semi's are prohibited on 35E (Dan Dobson)
   7. AN: Wanted: Multimedia Volunteer/Intern (possible stipend)
      (Tim Erickson)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 13:35:38 -0400
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [StPaul] Bataglia Implodes on KSTP
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

In case nobody else has mentioned it, Bataglia is not a Ramsey County
Commissioner. Where did you get the idea that she was?

Tom Goldstein
(Now) Midway-Hamline

Original Message:
-----------------
From: John Birrenbach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 09:29:03 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [StPaul] Bataglia Implodes on KSTP


Well I learned real fast who it is that I want in congress 
representing St Paul.

Patrice Bataglia was on KSTP-AM 1500 yesterday and the day before.  A 
bigger group of softballs could not have been tossed at here by 
"Repbulican Radio".... Well she couldn't seem to answer anything, or 
say anything other than She Wants to Debate the other Candidate about 
these issues.

Statements made by Bataglia on Tuesday indicated that US Troops have 
been attacked by Saddam Hussain with Biological Weapons.  When 
further questioned about it, she couldn't explain herself, other than 
to leave dead air and then say again "I want to debate the other 
candidate about these issues."

I have to ask myself How did she become a Ramsey County Commissioner? 
and have made the complete conclusion that she doesn't deserve to be 
a member of congress, (and mabye even removed from the County 
Commissioners as well next time her election is up).  She has no clue 
and can't even answer some of the EASIEST questions asked of her.

KSTP right now is saying they are working on getting BOTH interviews, 
which are extremely revealing about the candidate, up on their 
website for people to listen too.  I would expect that it shouldn't 
take them much more than over the weekend to have them up for 
listening.
http://www.am1500.com  Not sure where they will put it up at but I 
would look at the Ron and Marc morning show area of the site.

-- 
Sincerely,
John Birrenbach
W 7th Neighborhood, St Paul MN
=== Political & Business Consulting ===
http://www.birrenbach.com/
======================================
"Six years on the council has trained me to feign interest for long 
periods of time"
Chris Coleman Jan 21, 2004
+++++++++++++++
_____________________________________________
To Join:   St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

_____________________________________________
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

Archive Address:
   http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/


--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .




------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 13:39:55 -0500
From: "Chris Boylan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [StPaul] W7th Bus Way marches on - NOT SO
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> Accessing West Seventh from neighborhood streets has turned into one big
> hassle.  Tonight turning left (east) onto West Seveth from Armstrong to go

This is the flip side of the benefits of restriping for a center
turn lane.  You'll find also that cross traffic, whether on foot or
in a petrochemical consuming transport device, is much more
difficult because the breaks in traffic just shrunk by more 50%
due to speed reduction and tighter traffic.

Again, went through this on Fairview.  Figure out your shortest
path to a stop light by way of your neighorhood side streets and adjust.

In my view it's a fad and fad's don't need public notice - they
just happen.

Chris Boylan
Mac-Groveland & Downtown





------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:17:55 -0500
From: "Chris Boylan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [StPaul] Semi's are prohibited on 35E
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> 
> Any attempt to raise the speed limit or introduce
> large trucks on this portion of 35E would be met
> forcefully with legal action, in Federal Court, to
> enforce the original agreement. 
> 

And that's our traffic problem in a nutshell - not in my backyard.
How are we going to deal with this?

No offense to our neighbors in Summit-Hill but that traffic has to go 
somewhere and because government rolled over as part of this settlement 
that means Snelling, Ayd Mill road (Selby), Lexington and W 7th get this 
spill over freeway traffic because those cars are NOT going away, they 
are just going somewhere else.  

While I personally think trucks on 35E would be bad and raising the speed 
limit probably pointless at this point [45MPH in rush hour?  Don't you 
wish?], I believe the settlement also prohibited a direct east-bound 94 
to south bound 35E connection and therefore something in excessive of 
25,000 cars wander through the W. 7th and Lexington areas to connect.  

Someone correct me if I remember the settlement terms incorrectly or the 
car count wrong.  

Doesn't $3.99 gasoline sound like a good idea?

Chris Boylan
Mac-Groveland & Downtown




------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 17:39:20 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [StPaul] Semi's are prohibited on 35E
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

In a message dated 10/21/2004 3:17:55 PM Eastern Daylight Time, "Chris
Boylan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>I believe the settlement also prohibited a direct east-bound >94 to south
bound 35E connection and therefore something in >excessive of 25,000 cars
wander through the W. 7th and >Lexington areas to connect. �

>Someone correct me if I remember the settlement terms incorrectly or the
car count wrong. �
>

Well, on that one you are wrong.  There was never a desire on MNDOT or the
Fed's to create a direct connection between East bound 94 and South bound
35E.  There was also no desire on the Fed's or MNDOT's part to create a
direct connection between north bound 35E and west bound 94. So, there is no
mention of either of them in anyway in the settlement.  

We have done this before, but one more time just for the fun of it.  The
issues of the suit were the over building of freeways and the adverse impact
of individual land owners when (1) The Federal goals were already
accomplished (35 was completed through MPLS - these things were built to
move troops from Mexico to Canada - mission accomplished when 35W was
completed) (2) Less intrusive and less expensive options existed (Sheppard
Road or the re-designation of HWY 52) (3) The state had already concede the
lack of need by passing legislation requiring no direct connection between
35E and 94 (that law was later changed).  

There existed a real chance that we would have won in Federal Court and road
work would have been ordered stopped and Federal dollars would not have been
available to complete the roadway.  But a compromise was reached, 45 MPH and
no trucks.  Not a bad deal for the state considering if they lost they would
have lost all of the Federal dollars in the project.  

Any of the Ayde Mill issues, direct connection from east bound 94 to south
bound 35E or direct connection from north bound 35E to west bound 94 are
just in the minds of the commuters and those who live off of Ayde Mill, none
of whom were part of the law suit.

Chuck Repke
Party to the Law Suit
RIP 35E


------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:59:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dan Dobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [StPaul] Semi's are prohibited on 35E
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

With all due respect to Chris, I believe he is
mistaken on two points.

I haven't looked at the I-35E settlement since earlier
this year, (since 60 Speed Wilkin wanted to increase
the speed limit), but I do not believe that a direct
connection between I-94 eastbound to I-35 southbound
and likewise I-35E Northbound into I-94 westbound is
banned under the settlement. From what I understand it
is not now possible from an engineering point of view.
I discussed these options with a D.O.T. engineer at
one of the Ayd Mill Road meetings, (please do not ask
me who it was, as I don't recall), but he said that to
build a ramp from eastbound I-94 to I-35 is too much
of a drop.

I personally walked it later, and deemed it would be
possible, IF THE STATE WERE TO TUNNEL UNDER THE
HISTORY CENTER or DEMOLISH THE HISTORY CENTER FOR A
RAMP.

The second point Chris raises is NIMBY or Not in My
Backyard. This is not just me speaking. The 35E
settlement was negotiated, in Federal Court, a decade
before I moved to Summit Hill. We simply would be
assuring that a previous Federal Court settlement is
being enforced. What would be the good of Federal
settlements, or any settlement, if it could be set
aside as soon as the people who negotiated it, died
off or public/institutional memory forgot about it.

The settlement was negotiated to allow the highway to
be built in the first place. The other option was no
highway at all. It was a fair and reasonable
settlement then and I would argue that suburbanites
certainly got the better part of the deal. Just try
driving 45 in the left land at any time. Just the
other day I drove 50 in the left lane parallel with a
school bus and had a woman in a large SUV tailgate me,
repeatedly honk her horn and then give me the finger,
all because I didn't want to exceed the speed limit by
as much as she wanted to exceed it. 

I used to argue that Norm and Randy could pay for a
new Twins Stadium by just rigidly enforcing the speed
limit on 35E. But that might p.o. to many suburban
voters and you can't do that if . . . 

Dan Dobson
Summit Hill - Saint Paul
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--- Chris Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > 
> > Any attempt to raise the speed limit or introduce
> > large trucks on this portion of 35E would be met
> > forcefully with legal action, in Federal Court, to
> > enforce the original agreement. 
> > 
> 
> And that's our traffic problem in a nutshell - not
> in my backyard.
> How are we going to deal with this?
> 
> No offense to our neighbors in Summit-Hill but that
> traffic has to go 
> somewhere and because government rolled over as part
> of this settlement 
> that means Snelling, Ayd Mill road (Selby),
> Lexington and W 7th get this 
> spill over freeway traffic because those cars are
> NOT going away, they 
> are just going somewhere else.  
> 
> While I personally think trucks on 35E would be bad
> and raising the speed 
> limit probably pointless at this point [45MPH in
> rush hour?  Don't you 
> wish?], I believe the settlement also prohibited a
> direct east-bound 94 
> to south bound 35E connection and therefore
> something in excessive of 
> 25,000 cars wander through the W. 7th and Lexington
> areas to connect.  
> 
> Someone correct me if I remember the settlement
> terms incorrectly or the 
> car count wrong.  
> 
> Doesn't $3.99 gasoline sound like a good idea?
> 
> Chris Boylan
> Mac-Groveland & Downtown
> 
> 
> _____________________________________________
> To Join:   St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
> Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
> _____________________________________________
> NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  
> To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your
> password - visit:
> http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul
> 
> Archive Address:
>    http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/
> 



------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 15:02:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dan Dobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [StPaul] Semi's are prohibited on 35E
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Chuck -

I did not know you were one of the plaintiff's. Thank
you for all of your efforts.

Dan


--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> In a message dated 10/21/2004 3:17:55 PM Eastern
> Daylight Time, "Chris Boylan"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> >I believe the settlement also prohibited a direct
> east-bound >94 to south bound 35E connection and
> therefore something in >excessive of 25,000 cars
> wander through the W. 7th and >Lexington areas to
> connect. �
> 
> >Someone correct me if I remember the settlement
> terms incorrectly or the car count wrong. �
> >
> 
> Well, on that one you are wrong.  There was never a
> desire on MNDOT or the Fed's to create a direct
> connection between East bound 94 and South bound
> 35E.  There was also no desire on the Fed's or
> MNDOT's part to create a direct connection between
> north bound 35E and west bound 94. So, there is no
> mention of either of them in anyway in the
> settlement.  
> 
> We have done this before, but one more time just for
> the fun of it.  The issues of the suit were the over
> building of freeways and the adverse impact of
> individual land owners when (1) The Federal goals
> were already accomplished (35 was completed through
> MPLS - these things were built to move troops from
> Mexico to Canada - mission accomplished when 35W was
> completed) (2) Less intrusive and less expensive
> options existed (Sheppard Road or the re-designation
> of HWY 52) (3) The state had already concede the
> lack of need by passing legislation requiring no
> direct connection between 35E and 94 (that law was
> later changed).  
> 
> There existed a real chance that we would have won
> in Federal Court and road work would have been
> ordered stopped and Federal dollars would not have
> been available to complete the roadway.  But a
> compromise was reached, 45 MPH and no trucks.  Not a
> bad deal for the state considering if they lost they
> would have lost all of the Federal dollars in the
> project.  
> 
> Any of the Ayde Mill issues, direct connection from
> east bound 94 to south bound 35E or direct
> connection from north bound 35E to west bound 94 are
> just in the minds of the commuters and those who
> live off of Ayde Mill, none of whom were part of the
> law suit.
> 
> Chuck Repke
> Party to the Law Suit
> RIP 35E
> _____________________________________________
> To Join:   St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
> Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
> _____________________________________________
> NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  
> To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your
> password - visit:
> http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul
> 
> Archive Address:
>    http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/
> 



------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 10:36:03 -0500
From: Tim Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [StPaul] AN: Wanted: Multimedia Volunteer/Intern (possible
        stipend)
To: "St. Paul Issues Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"

------------------------------------------------
       WANTED: Multimedia Volunteer/Intern(s)

      Small Stipend Available for Lead Volunteer
             http://www.e-democracy.org
-------------------------------------------------

E-Democracy.Org is the midst of an exciting project to put together 
our story in a multimedia format using Flash with text, photo, 
illustration, audio, and video elements.

Working title:  The E-Democracy Experience

The focus of the online presentation will be our dynamic local Issues
Forums - Winona, St. Paul, and Minneapolis.  We need your help to 
bring them to life by displaying the real people and places tied to 
our civic discussions.

This will be part of a larger -international- pilot project that will 
soon be announced.  With the E-Democracy Experience, we will be in a 
better position to promote and expand our forums locally, recruit new 
volunteers and Forum Managers, and share our experiences with other 
communities.

If you have the skills and time to help us produce a Flash 
presentation that explains how our forums work and can convey the 
stories of our participants with a bit of new video and audio, your 
involvement will be vital.

Be part of our multimedia team.

We have a quick timeline and will start work in the next ten days. 
While we need fully volunteer hours from a handful of talented 
participants on our forums (become involved to make sure the story of 
your favorite forum is told well), if we find a good match, we have 
up to $500 available for one or two lead volunteers/interns with the 
time and some demonstrated multimedia experience.  The internship 
need not be for credit.

So, if you have any interest OR experience with Flash animation, 
digital video, or online multimedia projects AND are interested in 
helping us with this exciting project in any way, please let us know:

     [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Here is a summary of the most important details:

     DATES:      We need to start ASAP.
                 We have a Dec. 15 "draft" deadline with final
                 production required by the December 31

     RESOURCES:  We will have a DV video camera, but require
     volunteers with access to software tools and
     other editing resources

SKILLS NEEDED (some or all):
     Flash
     Digital Video
     Digital Photography
     Illustration
     Animation

     STIPEND:    If you are interested in the lead volunteer position
     please indicate that in you e-mail and share a link
     or information on your portfolio.

Contact:

     Tim Erickson, E-Democracy.Org
     651-643-0722
     651-246-5045
     [EMAIL PROTECTED]


More information on our Issues Forums:

Short article:
   http://www.e-democracy.org/do/commons.html
Survey and research:
   http://www.e-democracy.org/research/
Powerpoint presentation:
   http://www.e-democracy.org/research/issuesforum/issuesforum.ppt

http://E-Democracy.Org is a non-profit, non-partisan citizen-based
project, whose mission is to improve participation in democracy
through the use of information networks. E-Democracy hosts quality
online public spaces for citizen interaction on public issues.

-- 
=================================================
Tim Erickson              http://www.politalk.com
St. Paul, MN - USA                   651-643-0722
[EMAIL PROTECTED]             iChat/AIM: stpaultim
=================================================





------------------------------

_____________________________________________
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

Archive Address:
   http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/
_____________________________________________
For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract

End of Stpaul Digest, Vol 10, Issue 27
**************************************

_____________________________________________
To Join:   St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_____________________________________________
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

Archive Address:
   http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/

Reply via email to