Paul speaks of the inevitable growth of the cities and our interest in seeing 
it planned wisely.  I agree, with reservations.  The exponential growth of the 
20th century is behind us.  Despite projections of population growth (which 
sometimes are mystifying to me), we hear also that we graybeards will break 
Social Security because there won't be enough younger people to support the 
system.

So where will the growth come from?  This is a genuine question, probably for 
another thread, but we can say for certain that some of it will be from 
immigration.  Building on that strength, I think we need to focus on the 
Central Corridor and improvements to the existing system.  Transit into 
downtown is important, but what will there be to make downtown attractive if 
we've encouraged families to move farther and farther away?

This morning's article on the frustration of people demanding attention to Hwy 
100 underscores the need to re-examine what's "etched in stone."  How can we 
make the Cities vibrant and healthy so we don't become another Detroit?  This 
has nothing to do with building a wall; it has to do with making our city a 
great place to live and make a living. 
Gail O'Hare
St. Paul

  Message: 6
  Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 23:52:33 -0600
  From: Bob Spaulding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  Subject: Re: [StPaul] ... Transit
  To: St Paul Issues Forum <[email protected]>
  Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed

  Dear "Blue State Curmudgeon",

  You raise a question that I too initially asked. 

  Like it or not (and I generally fall into the latter category), the 
  Twin Cities is going to expand around the fringes.  We've expanded a 
  ton since I was a kid, and walked across what is now I-394 regularly.  
  The question is how we are going to grow.  Do we add highway lanes, 
  that encourage the more sprawling auto-oriented development?  Or do we 
  do a mix of new highways and new transit lines, that encourage the 
  development of more traditional town centers, like those that developed 
  in North St. Paul, Hopkins, Stillwater or Excelsior, often around the 
  streetcars?

  In the case of Northstar, there is a direct tradeoff between plowing 
  more money into adding lanes to I-94 and US 10 that go from Minneapolis 
  to St. Cloud.  Northstar will direct us to more traditional, compact 
  growth in town centers, and will eliminate the need to add 1.5 highway 
  lanes (according to http://www.northstartrain.org)

  I can't cite a specific study, but I understand it holds true that a 
  train increases the likelihood that an "exurban" commuter will commute 
  into a downtown core, and reduces congestion on urban freeways.  Would 
  you rather drive an hour, or take a train for an hour?  Now you have a 
  choice, and we Americans generally like choice.  Commuter trains 
  therefore also makes the urban core more attractive for new jobs, 
  corporate headquarters and investment.

  The link to St. Paul here is why, then, Red Rock and Rush Line are 
  important.  The train lines help direct growth to more compact town 
  centers, as opposed to directing it to sprawled suburban development we 
  see with a highways only approach.  But most significantly for St. Paul 
  in particular, it will provide a needed boost for downtown.  And even 
  if you never go downtown, the downtown can and should pay a big chunk 
  of the property tax bill, so you don't have to.  So in that sense, you 
  should care.

  That said, there is an order to the transit projects that is frankly 
  pretty much written in stone at this point.  Hiawatha, then Northstar, 
  then Central Corridor, then Red Rock/Rush/Southwest (in some order).  
  Questioning that wisdom may be a good discussion topic, but the 
  consensus is so broad, including so many governmental units, chambers 
  of commerce, legislators, congresspeople, and corporate leaders, that 
  it's not really going to change.  Perhaps someday our highway 
  expenditures will receive a comparable amount of scrutiny.

  Bob Spaulding
  Downtown


  On Feb 23, 2005, at 10:38 PM, Gail wrote:

  >
  > I have a hard time seeing the benefits in the Northstar line.  Like 
  > other transportation projects, its highest recommendation seems to be 
  > that it's there.  So we should forge ahead in order to get Federal 
  > money.... but why?  So more people can move out of the Cities, taking 
  > their tax support with them?  I'm not interested in supporting a 
  > megalopolis.  I want efficient transit within the Cities.  I don't 
  > want more and more people moving out, failing to support schools and 
  > public services, pouring back in every day to wear down our roads, use 
  > our water and sewer system, and demand services for which they don't 
  > pay.  Call me a Blue State Curmudgeon.
  >
  > Gail O'Hare
  > St. Paul
  >
  > T H E    G O O D :
  >
  > - NORTHSTAR MAY FINALLY BE FUNDED.  The Republican-controlled Minnesota
  > House, spurred by electoral losses that seemed to be related to
  > underfunding public transit, approved funding for the Northstar
  > Commuter Rail Line.  Northstar serves Minneapolis, but it paves the way
  > for other projects (see below).  The House had not approved the
  > Northstar funding before, yet still only approved $10 million of the
  > required $37.5 million needed to leverage $132 million in federal funds
  > for the train line.  It is thought that the full amount will be secured
  > in conferencce committee, with the Governor and Senate supporting the
  > full amount
  > -------------------------------------------------
  > JOIN the St. Paul Issues Forum TODAY:
  >                http://www.e-democracy.org/stpaul/
  > -------------------------------------------------
  > POST MESSAGES HERE:     [email protected]
  >
  > To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
  > http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul
  >
  > Archive Address:
  >    http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/
  >



  ------------------------------

  _____________________________________________
  NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [email protected]

  To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
  http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

  Archive Address:
     http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/
  _____________________________________________
  For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
  For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract

  End of Stpaul Digest, Vol 14, Issue 46
  **************************************
-------------------------------------------------
JOIN the St. Paul Issues Forum TODAY:
               http://www.e-democracy.org/stpaul/
-------------------------------------------------
POST MESSAGES HERE:     [email protected]

To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

Archive Address:
   http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/

Reply via email to