Diane's often clever repartee here and elsewhere notwithstanding, she misses
the point regarding Chris Coleman's role in ignoring neighborhood concerns
until the brewery shut down and Tom Fabel faded away from representing GSE.

I'm not going to repeat my earlier statement on Coleman's GSE involvement.
That's available in the archive for those nuts enough to call it up, but
it's disingenuous to defend Chris Coleman as having little or role in
protecting the ethanol company's interests far beyond the Fall of 2000.
Still, if delegates wish to cite Chris for his support of Kelly and GSE as
reason enough not to elevate him to the mayor's office, it's sure as hell
their prerogative.

However, Dennis' suggestion that Chris' connection to GSE alone should sway
delegates (and voters, I presume) from Coleman to Ortega may be reaching for
a hook for West 7th residents inclined to overlook Chris' self-serving
behavior in that issue, except that that same attitude pervaded much, not
all, of his "work" on the City Council, especially after it became clear
that his purported progressivity was nowhere to be found on a variety of
city issues and had no business claiming to be a DFLer.

The fact that Coleman's own ward convention failed to produce a majority of
delegates after two terms in office should speak volumes to delegates
elsewhere that his neighbors and, perhaps, previous supporters in his
council races, have walked to his competitor, Raphael Ortega, once Coleman's
next door neighbor.

No elected official can live up to the promises he's made, but being able to
defend his lies is another matter. From the beginning of his first campaign,
Coleman claimed credit for keeping the metal shredder from being built next
door to Our Lady of Guadalupe church as one example of neighborhood activism
that should qualify him for the office. In fact, Chris Coleman was nowhere
near the shredder issue. I was intimately involved with that effort and he
was nowhere to be seen.

The leaders of that committee, Lee Olson and Sherilyn (I'm sorry to have
forgotten her last name), with Michelle Hoffman and a few other West Siders
and a couple from other areas, did all the heavy pulling and politicking for
over two years. They were everywhere with our logo, flyers, news gatherings,
legislation, community meetings and I don't know what all. I sat on the
steering committee and helped on graphics, some lobbying and such, but
nowhere did any of us see Chris Coleman. Yet he played that issue like a
violin without a conductor to call him on it, and that was one of the
reasons the man who at least had a modicum of respect from me lost it
completely.

>From there, Coleman never had to defend his statements or his position in a
public arena, because, after the Ward 2 convention in 1997, he went forward
without opposition, leaving voters to only guess what sort of public servant
he would be. The litany of disappointments that have come out of his years
on the Council would fill a long scroll. He played his filial tie to his
father, Nick Coleman for all it was worth, and those who really knew Nick,
assume that, as a policymaker, he's been rolling in his blessed grave. No
saint was Nick, but the man had integrity and moxie and a true sense of
humor and great leadership qualities and Chris' claim to be the one scion to
have inherited that mantel is an empty one, in my view.

So. GSE history is rife with the hot and cold of Chris Coleman's
machinations, available only when it was convenient and never when it was
risky, changing loyalties and stripes when it suited his political purposes.
Absent the kind of integrity we should all be demanding of our candidates
and elected officials, no one seeking office by dint of pure ambition,
little understanding of the deep duty to the public interest and public
policy, and personal aggrandizement should be allowed to serve.

Andy Driscoll
Crocus Hill/Ward 2
--
 "Everything secret degenerates, even the administration of justice;
nothing is safe that does not show how it can bear discussion and
publicity." - Lord Acton
--
Visit our weblog: http://newswired.blogspot.com

Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 11:42:05 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [StPaul] GSE taint

�Do you now or have you ever had contact with someone who had coffee with
someone who once knew someone who from the get-go didn�t think Jack Lee
should be hauled into the street and shot like a rabid dog?�

Dennis thinks that Thune ought to support Ortega because �Chris Coleman
endorsed the candidate who was �backed by supporters of the ethanol plant�
in the city council race in 2003.��

Andrea wrote:� "I can't support anybody who has supported GSE - or for that
matter has been supported in return by GSE" �

Let�s be reasonable here.� If Chris accepted campaign contributions from
anyone connected with GSE for his run in 2000, let�s remember that back in
the fall of 2000 we were at a point where we�d had only one or two meetings
with plant officials, the CO2 facility hadn�t yet been installed, the
brewery jobs were still hanging in the balance, and we hadn�t run into the
resistance we later saw.�

Moreover, if the taint spreads as far as Dennis would have it (can�t support
anyone who accepted support from someone who supported GSE), take a look at
the unions here.�

One of the last times that GSE's ethanol producer payment subsidy was up for
consideration at the State legislature, it wasn't GSE up �there advocating
publicly that it be continued.� Nor was it the farmers.� No, not even the
other ethanol producers.� No lobbyists. No paid mouthpieces.

The lone speaker at the hearing saying that my tax dollars should continue
to pay for the deterioration of my neighborhood, the decline of my property
values, and the continued illness of my family and my neighbors was the
president of the Building and Construction Trades Council, Dick Anfang.� Are
we going to reject their endorsed candidates?�

I think we need to cut the taint off somewhere.

Diane Gerth
I really live in the West End

�Out, damned spot; out, I say . . . Yet who would have thought the old man
to have had so much blood in him?�� ��Macbeth, Act 5, Scene 1.

------ End of Forwarded Message

-------------------------------------------------
JOIN the St. Paul Issues Forum TODAY:
               http://www.e-democracy.org/stpaul/
-------------------------------------------------
POST MESSAGES HERE:     [email protected]

To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

Archive Address:
   http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/

Reply via email to