On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 05:45:51PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Friday 16 March 2012 16:18:33 Andreas Schwab wrote: > > "Dmitry V. Levin" writes: > > > Is it correct that rlim_t cannot be a long long type on linux, > > > or am I missing something? > > > > x32 is going to be the first. > > mips/n32 doesn't ?
btw, how one can reliably identify that kind of information just looking at the kernel? For example, we have an oddness in file.c with several different definitions of sys_lseek, one for HAVE_LONG_LONG_OFF_T, another for !HAVE_LONG_LONG_OFF_T, and yet another one for LINUX_MIPSN32 where off_t is actually emulated via "long long". How could it be that off_t is not a "long long" type but lseek takes a "long long" argument? -- ldv
pgpC6SYBLCwA8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
_______________________________________________ Strace-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/strace-devel
