On 03/17/2012 06:17 PM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 05:45:51PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> On Friday 16 March 2012 16:18:33 Andreas Schwab wrote: >>> "Dmitry V. Levin" writes: >>>> Is it correct that rlim_t cannot be a long long type on linux, >>>> or am I missing something? >>> >>> x32 is going to be the first. >> >> mips/n32 doesn't ? > > btw, how one can reliably identify that kind of information > just looking at the kernel? > > For example, we have an oddness in file.c with several different > definitions of sys_lseek, one for HAVE_LONG_LONG_OFF_T, another for > !HAVE_LONG_LONG_OFF_T, and yet another one for LINUX_MIPSN32 where > off_t is actually emulated via "long long". How could it be that > off_t is not a "long long" type but lseek takes a "long long" > argument?
Dmitry, I'm working on that one... Want to set up multi-arch build test before I mess it up though... -- vda ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure _______________________________________________ Strace-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/strace-devel
