On Tuesday 17 April 2012 20:23:49 Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 04:36:12PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > + if (!abbrev(tcp)) {
> > + tprintf("device=%" PRIi64 ", inode=%" PRIi64 ", "
> > + "rdevice=%" PRIi64 ", offset=%#" PRIx64 ", "
> > + "sizelimit=%" PRIi64 ", number=%" PRIi32,
> > + (uint64_t) info64.lo_device,
> > + (uint64_t) info64.lo_inode,
> > + (uint64_t) info64.lo_rdevice,
> > + (uint64_t) info64.lo_offset,
> > + (uint64_t) info64.lo_sizelimit,
> > + (uint32_t) info64.lo_number);
> > + } else {
>
> We can have more consistency here, e.g. natural printing format specifiers
> for uint64_t are PRIu64 and PRIx64, while PRIi64 is more appropriate for
> the signed type.sure ... was just an oversight -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second resolution app monitoring today. Free. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
_______________________________________________ Strace-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/strace-devel
