On 4 February 2014 20:01, Dmitry V. Levin <l...@altlinux.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 09:59:07PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
>> +/* Nios-II specific compare and exchange syscall for atomic operations */
>> +int sys_nios2cmpxchg(struct tcb *tcp)
>> +{
>> + if (entering(tcp)) {
>> + tprintf(", 0x%lx, %#lx, %#lx", tcp->u_arg[0], tcp->u_arg[1],
>> + tcp->u_arg[2]);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return RVAL_HEX;
>> +}
>
> This is confusing:
> - output starts with ", ";
Ah, yes. Fixed.
> - both 0x%lx and %#lx are used in the same format line.
>
Hm? I took it from the cmpxchg analogue syscall in or1k, which seemed
correct to me.
0x%lx is for the address, and %#lx for the old and new values.
Could you explain what looks confusing? I guess I'm missing something...
--
Ezequiel García, VanguardiaSur
www.vanguardiasur.com.ar
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications
Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls.
Read the Whitepaper.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121051231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Strace-devel mailing list
Strace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/strace-devel
