On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 06:32:29AM +0530, Zubin Mithra wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 4:53 AM, Dmitry V. Levin <l...@altlinux.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 10:18:11PM +0530, zubin.mit...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
> >> * Type of `show_fd_path` changed from `bool` to `unsigned int` to
> >>   support the `-yy` flag
> >
> > Why do you want to decode returned descriptors only for -yy?
> > Backwards compatibility?
> 
> Yes, that is what I had in mind. "-y" would behave as it always had,
> while "-yy" would have decoding of return fds, path resolution of
> arguments etc.

I understand your concerns, but the change just extends the number of
cases when file descriptors are decoded.  I agree that path resolution,
socket resolution etc. worth an extra -y option, but this patch doesn't
change the way how file descriptors are decoded.  That is, I'd rather add
this extension for single -y option.

btw, please note that we use tprints instead of tprintf when the argument
is not a format string.


-- 
ldv

Attachment: pgpptfAuHMQwi.pgp
Description: PGP signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Time is money. Stop wasting it! Get your web API in 5 minutes.
www.restlet.com/download
http://p.sf.net/sfu/restlet
_______________________________________________
Strace-devel mailing list
Strace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/strace-devel

Reply via email to