Hi Dmitry, >> Yes, that is what I had in mind. "-y" would behave as it always had, >> while "-yy" would have decoding of return fds, path resolution of >> arguments etc. > > I understand your concerns, but the change just extends the number of > cases when file descriptors are decoded. I agree that path resolution, > socket resolution etc. worth an extra -y option, but this patch doesn't > change the way how file descriptors are decoded. That is, I'd rather add > this extension for single -y option.
Ah, I see. I misunderstood your earlier email. Let me fix that. > > btw, please note that we use tprints instead of tprintf when the argument > is not a format string. I'll fix that too. Cheers, -- zm ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Time is money. Stop wasting it! Get your web API in 5 minutes. www.restlet.com/download http://p.sf.net/sfu/restlet _______________________________________________ Strace-devel mailing list Strace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/strace-devel
