On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 09:50:54PM +0530, Jay Joshi wrote: > Thanks. > One more query: I'm not able to see any usage of "link" syscall in > tests subdir. Although, covecov is highlighting "link" syscall in > green, which I presume indicates test for that syscall is covered. > What am I missing here?
Some syscalls are so similar to other syscalls that they share the same parser code. For example, $ git grep sys_link linux/ linux/dummy.h:#define sys_pivotroot sys_link linux/dummy.h:#define sys_rename sys_link linux/dummy.h:#define sys_symlink sys_link As we've got a test for rename syscall, it covers the code that is used by link, pivot_root, and symlink syscall parsers. So in fact the "link" syscall is not covered, but it's parser is. -- ldv
pgp0ZwEk43znF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Transform Data into Opportunity. Accelerate data analysis in your applications with Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library. Click to learn more. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785231&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________ Strace-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/strace-devel
