On Sep 26, 2008, at 8:39 AM, Francis Drouillard wrote: > On Sep 26, 2008, at 7:23 AM, Brian Lawson wrote: >> On Sep 26, 2008, at 8:17 AM, Francis Drouillard wrote: >>> On Sep 26, 2008, at 6:55 AM, Brian Lawson wrote: >>>> On Sep 26, 2008, at 7:51 AM, Francis Drouillard wrote: >>>>> On Sep 26, 2008, at 5:08 AM, richardsan san wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> but should she have? >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/b/a/2008/09/25/nov05election-palin_explains.DTL >>>>> >>>>> Why so gleeful about such blatant press bias? >>>> >>>> So you believe that asking a candidate to explain a comment which >>>> to most Americans (and the rest of the world) makes no sense is >>>> blatant bias? I thought it was their job to seek clarification on >>>> important matters for the public. >>> >>> >>> Enough of your attempts at "gotcha" bullshit, Brian. When are you >>> going to stop asking me to defend things I didn't say or write? >>> >>> When Couric and other elite media snobs are as tough with Obama >>> and Biden as they are with Palin, you won't hear me complaining >>> about bias. Any fair minded person can see the contempt Couric >>> (and Gibson) had for Palin and her glee at getting her silly >>> little "gotcha!" >>> >>> Despicable. And so are you for defending such bias. >> >> I defended nothing. I asked you to clarify your statement. No >> gotchas, no bias. Just another attempt at clarification. Sorry it >> seems to piss you off so much that people want to understand what >> other people mean by what they say.. > > You're really full of shit this morning, Brian. Absolutely full of it. > > You are defending Couric's bias by refusing to even consider that it > exists. You did try to imply that I'm against the press asking tough > questions when I'm not. And, you failed to clarify which comment of > Palin's needed clarification. > > Again, a fair minded person -- if you know what that is -- would see > that Couric's goal, and Gibson's for that matter, was to make Palin > look bad rather than paint a fair picture of her stance on the issues. > > If that's okay with you, then just admit you think it's acceptable > for the press to grill Palin harder than Obama or Biden. > > I prefer to see the "real" Obama and Biden as well as the "real" > Palin.
Here's a straight out question for you Francis - what happened to your rules of civilized discourse? Somebody piss in your Wheaties this morning? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "StrataList-OT" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/StrataList-OT?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
