On Sep 26, 2008, at 7:41 AM, Brian Lawson wrote: > On Sep 26, 2008, at 8:39 AM, Francis Drouillard wrote: >> On Sep 26, 2008, at 7:23 AM, Brian Lawson wrote: >>> On Sep 26, 2008, at 8:17 AM, Francis Drouillard wrote: >>>> On Sep 26, 2008, at 6:55 AM, Brian Lawson wrote: >>>>> On Sep 26, 2008, at 7:51 AM, Francis Drouillard wrote: >>>>>> On Sep 26, 2008, at 5:08 AM, richardsan san wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> but should she have? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/b/a/2008/09/25/ >>>>>>> nov05election-palin_explains.DTL >>>>>> >>>>>> Why so gleeful about such blatant press bias? >>>>> >>>>> So you believe that asking a candidate to explain a comment >>>>> which to most Americans (and the rest of the world) makes no >>>>> sense is blatant bias? I thought it was their job to seek >>>>> clarification on important matters for the public. >>>> >>>> >>>> Enough of your attempts at "gotcha" bullshit, Brian. When are >>>> you going to stop asking me to defend things I didn't say or write? >>>> >>>> When Couric and other elite media snobs are as tough with Obama >>>> and Biden as they are with Palin, you won't hear me complaining >>>> about bias. Any fair minded person can see the contempt Couric >>>> (and Gibson) had for Palin and her glee at getting her silly >>>> little "gotcha!" >>>> >>>> Despicable. And so are you for defending such bias. >>> >>> I defended nothing. I asked you to clarify your statement. No >>> gotchas, no bias. Just another attempt at clarification. Sorry it >>> seems to piss you off so much that people want to understand what >>> other people mean by what they say.. >> >> You're really full of shit this morning, Brian. Absolutely full of >> it. >> >> You are defending Couric's bias by refusing to even consider that >> it exists. You did try to imply that I'm against the press asking >> tough questions when I'm not. And, you failed to clarify which >> comment of Palin's needed clarification. >> >> Again, a fair minded person -- if you know what that is -- would >> see that Couric's goal, and Gibson's for that matter, was to make >> Palin look bad rather than paint a fair picture of her stance on >> the issues. >> >> If that's okay with you, then just admit you think it's acceptable >> for the press to grill Palin harder than Obama or Biden. >> >> I prefer to see the "real" Obama and Biden as well as the "real" >> Palin. > > Here's a straight out question for you Francis - what happened to > your rules of civilized discourse? Somebody piss in your Wheaties > this morning?
I skip breakfast so it wouldn't matter. Here's a straight up question for you -- do you notice any difference in the way Couric interviewed Biden and way she interviewed Palin? Any at all? Try to keep your focus on Couric instead of me. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "StrataList-OT" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/StrataList-OT?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
