After reading that intellectually dishonest diatribe, i just had to  
walk the dog before responding.

You've really stepped to new lows, Michael. Your post is worthy of  
nothing but contempt and disgust.




On Oct 17, 2008, at 2:58 PM, Michael Luscombe wrote:

>
> On 17-Oct-08, at 5:20 PM, Francis Drouillard wrote:
>
>> On Oct 17, 2008, at 1:04 PM, Michael Luscombe wrote:
>>
>>> I don't know about anyone else here, but I had a really hard time
>>> watching that video TEN posted.
>>
>> Yeah, me too. I have trouble with any "news" story produced by Al
>> Jazeera.
>>
>> To be clear, I think those people are nuts, but I object to the
>> premise that only Republicans think that way. For all I know, all of
>> them could be Democrats voting for McCain because he's the only
>> pigment-deprived candidate.
> --
>
> Er, no, one lady is voting against Barack because this is a
> "christian nation", where "christian" apparently means white, since
> Barack is already christian.
>
> Another is voting for Palin, because she's filled with the "holy
> spirit", where Obama is filled with, what, beer and fried chicken?
>
> "For all you know" is exactly what I know from the video. Making shit
> up to defend this doesn't help your case any.
>
> I guess "Al Jazeera" is an enemy combatant in the war on reality. Had
> they known they were talking to the enemy, I assume every one of
> those citizens would have punched that guy in the face and presented
> a clearer picture of what they thought.
>
> In any case, I don't think anyone thought that actual evidence would
> shake your talking points.
>
>
>>> Ignorant, ignorant, ignorant.
>>>
>>> I have a really hard time respecting someone's viewpoint when it's
>>> clear it's based on ignorance and fear and xenophobia.
>>
>> Who's asking to you respect their viewpoint?
> --
>
> If you'll open your eyes for a few moments, you'll see that this is
> the tenor of McCain's campaign. He's injecting lies and fear to turn
> voters who aren't going to do any research or consider any of his
> "facts" critically.
>
> It doesn't matter that the real facts are out there, or that they've
> been refuted. They have faith that the good Republicans are looking
> out for their interests.
>
> This is your base, buddy, start cuddling.
>
>
>> My problem with the way this issue is being used. Ask Obama a tough
>> question and you become a racist. If he happens to lose a close
>> election, everyone the voted for McCain will be tagged a racist. And
>> the hypocrites in Canada and Europe will call America a racist
>> country. Bastards!
> --
>
> Bullshit. No one has been called "racist" for asking Obama tough
> questions. That was a complete fabrication, and I there's no reason I
> should be defending it.
>
> You become a racist when you spew the kind of vile and ignorant
> things McCain supporters do at his rallies. Do I really have to
> justify calling someone ignorant when they get up in front of McCain
> and say they're scared of Obama because he's "an arab"? Even McCain
> can't believe how well his lies are working.
>
>
>>> I guess that flags me as an "elitist".
>>
>> No, it just gives you an opportunity to flaunt your moral superiority
>> over those with whom you disagree on public policy.
>
> --
>
> They were spitting back the same crap that McCain has put out there.
> Every racist, ignorant word was an outright lie that McCain has said
> or suggested. But you don't mind that they don't know any better,
> because they're voting for your guy.
>
> I can flaunt my moral superiority only because your ideology is
> morally bankrupt. You've set the bar so low, I really only need a
> basic respect for humanity to feel like Ghandi around you.
>
> --
> Michael
>
>
> >


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"StrataList-OT" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/StrataList-OT?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to