On Nov 12, 2008, at 6:12 PM, Michael Luscombe wrote:

>
> On 12-Nov-08, at 8:42 PM, Francis Drouillard wrote:
>
>> And Michael Luscombe of Stratalist-ot says "Spending like this needs
>> to be socially unacceptable and reallyeffect the company's bottom
>> line."
>>
>> I'd rather put them in jail. And Paulson and Bernanke, too. Suit 'em
>> up in orange and send 'em to those dog cages in Gitmo.
> --
>
> I can't agree with Gitmo, but yes, I think opening this up to some
> serious investigation, and wall-to-wall transparency, would be in
> everyone's best interest.
>
> If companies are spending taxpayer money frivolously, it needs to be
> on the news.
>
> Frankly, I still don't get it. Why are they giving this much money to
> private companies? What kind of guarantees do they have? What kind of
> control do they have?
>
> This doesn't feel like Republican "self-reliance" or Democrat "nanny-
> state" bullshit, this just feels like theft. Obama's vote for this
> bill definitely tainted my opinion of him, although he was never the
> freakin' pope like some people like to believe. McCain did as well,
> of course, so it was a sour note for both of them.

Who knows what they were told? I don't, do you? Chris Dodd wouldn't  
say. All Harry Reid said is "we don't know what to do." That's  
probably the most truthful statement of the whole affair.

>>>> So, what's it like in Canada where you all your problems have been
>>>> solved?
>>> --
>>>
>>> Why would you give a shit? I could bring up Canadian politics, but
>>> you wouldn't know the people or the issues or the laws, and likely
>>> you wouldn't care in the least.
>>
>> Response Alternative #1: You Canadians can be so open and friendly at
>> times.
>>
>> Response Alternative #2: I think it odd you rarely, if ever, mention
>> Canadian politics.
>>
>> Response Alternative #3: Is this a quiz?
> --
>
> I'm just saying, I'm fully aware that Canadian politics are
> completely irrelevant on the world stage.
>
> That's exactly how I like it.

And Catholics pretend Heaven is for them only. Don't be so sure folks  
don't watch or don't care.

>>> I voted NPD in the last election, not because I wanted them to win,
>>> necessarily, but because I want the CDN government split a little
>>> more evenly between the three parties. My local NDP rep didn't win,
>>> but I didn't expect her to. The conservatives were denied a majority
>>> again, so I'm satisfied.
> --
>
> No response to this? Is it because it's completely meaningless to you?

No, I just don't like long, multi-topic threads, or conversations for  
that matter.

>>> With a (looming?) recession, we got an awesome mortgage renewal  
>>> rate.
>>
>> I hope for your sake that it's a fixed mortgage.
> --
>
> Variable, for now. We can lock in whenever. Prime has dropped a full
> point since we renewed. I'd love to see it go even lower as they try
> to encourage borrowing.
>
>
>>> Oh, and I've got a son on the way (March), so prepping for that has
>>> been my primary focus of late =)
>>>
>>> I'm very excited =)
>>
>> The baby card! You played the baby card in a political rant!
> --
>
> Yep. Next week I'm going to have a sick parent to win an argument.

Well, with parents you're limited to two. With babies, you can set  
your own limit.

>> I hope it turns out a happy, healthy, loud and demanding baby.
> --
>
> Me too. As long as it's healthy, it could scream for the first 4
> months, and I'll still beam.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"StrataList-OT" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/StrataList-OT?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to