On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Bruce Johnson < [email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Feb 15, 2009, at 1:29 AM, Mark wrote: > > > > > http://www.law.com/jsp/tal/digestTAL.jsp?id=1202428237157 > > > > "This is the story of a settlement only a lawyer could love. But then, > > it comes in a trademark infringement case only a law firm would have > > thought to bring." > > > > One: Law firms are notoriously paranoid about this sort of thing. > > Two: Legal representation is cheap for them. > > Three: The law firm that gets a winning case over "deep linking = > copyright infringement" is going to make a bazillion bucks. This is > the holy grail for publishing lawyers. > > And until someone beats $54 million for a pair of pants that the dry > cleaner lost, the title for 'Silliest lawsuit and most egregious abuse > of the legal system ever!' is still held by this guy < > http://tinyurl.com/4cbhg5 > > > don't be too hasty, gentlemen: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-10164264-37.html?tag=newsFeaturedBlogArea.0 At 11:23 AM -0600 11/29/08, Chris Bischoff said: Just nod and smile, that's a smart pair you have there. Mugsy replies: why thanks, (blush). --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "StrataList-OT" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/StrataList-OT?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
