On Feb 15, 2009, at 1:29 AM, Mark wrote:
> > http://www.law.com/jsp/tal/digestTAL.jsp?id=1202428237157 > > "This is the story of a settlement only a lawyer could love. But then, > it comes in a trademark infringement case only a law firm would have > thought to bring." > One: Law firms are notoriously paranoid about this sort of thing. Two: Legal representation is cheap for them. Three: The law firm that gets a winning case over "deep linking = copyright infringement" is going to make a bazillion bucks. This is the holy grail for publishing lawyers. And until someone beats $54 million for a pair of pants that the dry cleaner lost, the title for 'Silliest lawsuit and most egregious abuse of the legal system ever!' is still held by this guy <http://tinyurl.com/4cbhg5 > -- Bruce Johnson "Wherever you go, there you are" B. Banzai, PhD --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "StrataList-OT" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/StrataList-OT?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
