Sent from my iPad
On Oct 21, 2010, at 11:46 AM, Francis Drouillard <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't think you understand who the Tea Partiers are or what they want. You're saying it's a necessity to send immature and inexperienced "every persons" To Washington to make new/more laws/legislation to fix what needs fixing? How does a regular person with some aptitude see that as reducing spending and creating a smaller government? And since it seems like a task that NEEDS intelligence, why send in the clowns from the far right? This is a serious undertaking. The republicans there now are obstructing and NOT doing the work they were sent there to do, and that is to represent the people, not big corporations. > > Most haven't been involved in politics before, and most want a smaller > federal government with limited powers. There are pretenders, such as the > third party candidate for US Senate in Nevada. (Actual Tea Partiers back > Angle, the Republican candidate.) > > Most local "Tea Parties" are organized by women that are political neophytes. > Nothing wrong with that. In fact, I prefer them over the professional > politicians we send to Washington, D.C., especially if their goal is to > drastically reduce spending and federal power. Ahhh...Just like I thought, tea parties r4 girls. How are the gaggle of women of the tea baggers political neophytes? Christine isn't, Sharon isn't,...who are you referring to? > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "StrataList-OT" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en.
