On Oct 3, 2011, at 5:34 PM, Francis Drouillard wrote:

> Dump the TSA and have airlines provide their own security. Passengers can 
> then choose how much security they want. Make airlines insure themselves for 
> any damage caused by a hijacked airliner.
> 
> There, problem solved the Libertarian way.


Yes, insured by insurance companies unregulated by that ol' debbil gummint, so 
we can expertly choose an insyurance company who may or may not be fudging the 
numbers. Of course this is in the skies governed by free-market principled AIr 
Traffic controllers so we can choose expertly the appropriate set of 
controllers to use among all the others and simply hope out free-market pilots 
are well trained enough to dodge the traffic on the conflicting lanes.

Finally, since the only way to know how well any given airline's security will 
work, in a libertarian world where there are no pesky government regulations 
about obsfucating financial and legal records by corporations, is to know it's 
rate of failure, which for rare, one off events are entirely impossible to 
determine.

Of course in your free market libertarian world an airline and insurance 
company will simply declare bankruptcy when faced with any serious claim, 
because any corporation with even the most half-assed lawyers will structure 
the airline and insurance companies as one-off corporations, so that ther eis 
never any ACTUAL risk of paying off claims. 

Caveat Emptor only works when the consumer has accurate and timely information 
and is expert enough to evaluate it, AND can afford legal representation to 
survive through the clogged civil courts system to win out over the more 
powerful corporation's legal team.

In your fantasy libertarian, randian world you're all experts in every possible 
field and discipline, true Heinleinian heros and the Worlds Most Interesting 
Man all in one.

Are you considering a second career as a lawyer, because that's what a 
Libertarian world is: of the lawyers, for the lawyers and by the lawyers. 

Even IF there are laws against fraud, regulations requiring insurance companies 
maintain sufficient capital to pay off potential losses, and rules previnting 
liability-limiting tactics, your hatred of government and in particular taxes 
will lead to underfunding of any enfoircement agency so as to render the laws 
moot.

The logical conclusion of your Free Market, Libertarian, Unconstrained by 
government regulation world is corporate/gangster syndicates. He who has the 
gold makes the rules.

Most of us don't want to live in such a world, and so elect governments to 
prevent that sort of thing, because MOST of us are not consumed by the fantasy 
that we're "true Heinleinian heros and the Worlds Most Interesting Man all in 
one."

"There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The 
Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often 
engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an 
emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real 
world. The other, of course, involves orcs."

-- 
Bruce Johnson
University of Arizona
College of Pharmacy
Information Technology Group

Institutions do not have opinions, merely customs


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"StrataList-OT" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en.

Reply via email to