On Feb 4, 2012, at 4:25 PM, Francis Drouillard wrote: > Again, so what? That doesn't still doesn't mean the Democrats are entitled to > appoint their losing candidate to the office. >
Who's appointing anyone? If one of the candidates was not legally a candidate, the legal candidate with the most votes won the election. > What they should be calling for is a new election, but that wouldn't work out > as well for them. > Soooo...cheat, break the law and when you get caught, declare a do-over, hoping you won't get caught this time? -- Bruce Johnson "Wherever you go, there you are" B. Banzai, PhD -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "StrataList-OT" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en.
