On Feb 28, 2012, at 12:54 PM, M Christol wrote: > http://blog.nj.com/njv_paul_mulshine/2012/02/another_judge_who_should_be_in.html
Sigh. It's not your "First Amendment Right" to ignore the state law regarding secretly recording court proceedings. Also, Judges have wide latitude to declare someone in contempt. Finally, *victims* do not get a say in criminal proceedings. For the victim to insert himself here would be treated as contempt of court just about anywhere. Since this is a criminal trial the transcripts are public record, so it should be relatively simple to ascertain what actually happened. And I don't know why they had a Zombie pope...Jesus is the zombie. These yahoos can't even get that right... -- Bruce Johnson University of Arizona College of Pharmacy Information Technology Group Institutions do not have opinions, merely customs -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "StrataList-OT" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en.
