On 2/28/12 3:56 PM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
On Feb 28, 2012, at 12:54 PM, M Christol wrote:
http://blog.nj.com/njv_paul_mulshine/2012/02/another_judge_who_should_be_in.html
Sigh. It's not your "First Amendment Right" to ignore the state law regarding
secretly recording court proceedings. Also, Judges have wide latitude to declare someone
in contempt. Finally, *victims* do not get a say in criminal proceedings. For the victim
to insert himself here would be treated as contempt of court just about anywhere.
Since this is a criminal trial the transcripts are public record, so it should
be relatively simple to ascertain what actually happened.
And I don't know why they had a Zombie pope...Jesus is the zombie.
These yahoos can't even get that right...
dude's just trying to get attention & like the judge said, he's just
looking like a doofus
I think there ws a pope who got dug up from his grave & put on trial
once - the good old days
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"StrataList-OT" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en.
