Wow, someone is having a SENIOR MOMENT. Whoulda thunk it? Testing for eligibility is not the same as defending against a crime. Once you calm down a bit you may agree. What is a crime is using forged documents. The long form posted was clearly a forgery. The question is who did it and why.
So, why do you ignore the evidence that the long form posted is actually a forgery. Too lazy to check it out for yourself? Maybe you'll change your mind if Marco Rubio accepts the nod for VP. On Apr 21, 2012, at 1:12 PM, Brian Lawson wrote: > Funny how you refuse to accept the word of a REPUBLICAN governor who says > he's seen the original and it is real. Plus, you're forgetting that in this > country people accused of a crime are INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY. It is up > to the accusers to prove the accusations. The accused do not have to prove > their innocence. No one has proven any of their claims in this regard. All > they do is continue to ignore the evidence which refutes their claims. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "StrataList-OT" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en.
