Since you are claiming that Obama has presented a forged document you are in fact accusing him of a crime - the crime of forging a birth certificate.
What was that you were saying about insulting people who disagree with you? -- Brian On Apr 21, 2012, at 2:43 PM, Francis Drouillard wrote: > Wow, someone is having a SENIOR MOMENT. Whoulda thunk it? > > Testing for eligibility is not the same as defending against a crime. Once > you calm down a bit you may agree. What is a crime is using forged documents. > The long form posted was clearly a forgery. The question is who did it and > why. > > So, why do you ignore the evidence that the long form posted is actually a > forgery. Too lazy to check it out for yourself? > > Maybe you'll change your mind if Marco Rubio accepts the nod for VP. > > On Apr 21, 2012, at 1:12 PM, Brian Lawson wrote: > >> Funny how you refuse to accept the word of a REPUBLICAN governor who says >> he's seen the original and it is real. Plus, you're forgetting that in this >> country people accused of a crime are INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY. It is up >> to the accusers to prove the accusations. The accused do not have to prove >> their innocence. No one has proven any of their claims in this regard. All >> they do is continue to ignore the evidence which refutes their claims. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "StrataList-OT" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en.
