Yeah, I guess the web is not Swing and it will never be, huh?
The sooner people understand it, the better for them (and for us, who
have to go through "another desktop-like framework for the web"
every couple of years and see that it just doesn't work that way. The
HTML and the DOM are not Swing components and will never be. I would
love the existence of a committee that could ban component oriented
paradigms in web frameworks :)
Cosmin
"<p wicket:id="message">This is replaced</p>"
public HelloWorldPage() {
Label component = new Label("message", "Hello World!");
add(component);
add(new Label("wicketId", "dynamicTitle");.
}
UGH ... Why would you want to write an app like that? It's like a swing app, which is ok, except you still _have_ the template only you've moved what would be simple template code into their strange java api. If that's really how you add the <title> to the page I'd imagine new developers will be bringing up the javadoc for a long time. I've looked at the stripes java doc maybe 15 times over 2 years, it's so simple the wiki covers 80% in 60 minutes.
I might give it a try just to see how awkward it is, maybe it eventually leads to benefits and I am being shortsighted. I definitely buy the 'more java code is good for refactoring tools' argument. Even if you use wicket and refactor like crazy you still have to go over your templates by hand like stripes ... so at the end of the day it's probably not a huge gain. I'd like to see a reasonably sized example, like the stripes calculator written in wicket.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike McNally [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 10:08 AM
To: Stripes Users List
Subject: Re: [Stripes-users] tieTYT blog post Wicket/Stripes
Well to each his own, and that's one nice thing about the Java
framework world - there's something for everybody. However I looked at
Wicket and Tapestry for a while and could never figure out why anybody
would ever want to write an application that way, so I decided it must
be one of those "basic brain wiring" issues. I suppose my preferences
seem bizarre to a Wicket fan :-)
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 8:52 AM, VANKEISBELCK Remi <[email protected]> wrote:
I think it's the first really negative post I read about Wicket, and I
second Freddy, it's nicely written, good points.
Cheers
Remi
2009/3/27 Freddy Daoud <[email protected]>:
A nice nod to Stripes at the end.
Nice write-up, tieTYT!
http://tietyt.blogspot.com/2009/03/top-8-reasons-i-dont-use-wicket.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Stripes-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stripes-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Stripes-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stripes-users
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Stripes-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stripes-users
