Hello guys, I have read the article from dzone link.
If we compare wicket hello world example with stripes hello world example, we will see which framework is the best choice. Stripes Admirer Azizi Yazit On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Cosmin Marginean <[email protected]>wrote: > Yeah, I guess the web is not Swing and it will never be, huh? > The sooner people understand it, the better for them (and for us, who have > to go through *"another desktop-like framework for the web"* every couple > of years and see that it just doesn't work that way. The HTML and the DOM > are not Swing components and will never be. I would love the existence of a > committee that could ban component oriented paradigms in web frameworks :) > > Cosmin > > "<p wicket:id="message">This is replaced</p>" > > public HelloWorldPage() { > Label component = new Label("message", "Hello World!"); > add(component); > add(new Label("wicketId", "dynamicTitle");. > } > > UGH ... Why would you want to write an app like that? It's like a swing > app, which is ok, except you still _have_ the template only you've moved what > would be simple template code into their strange java api. If that's really > how you add the <title> to the page I'd imagine new developers will be > bringing up the javadoc for a long time. I've looked at the stripes java doc > maybe 15 times over 2 years, it's so simple the wiki covers 80% in 60 minutes. > > I might give it a try just to see how awkward it is, maybe it eventually > leads to benefits and I am being shortsighted. I definitely buy the 'more > java code is good for refactoring tools' argument. Even if you use wicket > and refactor like crazy you still have to go over your templates by hand like > stripes ... so at the end of the day it's probably not a huge gain. I'd like > to see a reasonably sized example, like the stripes calculator written in > wicket. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike McNally [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] > Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 10:08 AM > To: Stripes Users List > Subject: Re: [Stripes-users] tieTYT blog post Wicket/Stripes > > Well to each his own, and that's one nice thing about the Java > framework world - there's something for everybody. However I looked at > Wicket and Tapestry for a while and could never figure out why anybody > would ever want to write an application that way, so I decided it must > be one of those "basic brain wiring" issues. I suppose my preferences > seem bizarre to a Wicket fan :-) > > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 8:52 AM, VANKEISBELCK Remi <[email protected]> > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I think it's the first really negative post I read about Wicket, and I > second Freddy, it's nicely written, good points. > > Cheers > > Remi > > 2009/3/27 Freddy Daoud <[email protected]> <[email protected]>: > > > A nice nod to Stripes at the end. > Nice write-up, tieTYT! > http://tietyt.blogspot.com/2009/03/top-8-reasons-i-dont-use-wicket.html > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Stripes-users mailing > [email protected]https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stripes-users > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Stripes-users mailing > [email protected]https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stripes-users > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Stripes-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stripes-users > >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Stripes-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stripes-users
