I'm so sorry, I was looking (and editing) the wrong xml file. I guess there
can actually be two web.xml files? I have one in
tomcat/apache-tomcat-6.0.16/conf/web.xml
and one (more local) in
tomcat/apache-tomcat-6.0.16/webapps/ROOT/WEB-INF/web.xml
Since changing the first one had effect on my website I assumed I had found
the right one, but they are both used I guess?
This was what confused me, and I got it working now. Thank you so much, and
so sorry for this silly mistake.
Bjorn
2010/10/4 VANKEISBELCK Remi <r...@rvkb.com>
> Huh..? I can't see how Stripes would work without dispatcher servlet
> mapping or at least DMF... It ain't Stripes related btw, that's just how
> servlets work, with URL mappings...
>
> You can post your web.xml here if it's ok for you ?
>
> Cheers
>
> Remi
>
>
> 2010/10/4 Oddbjørn Sjøgren <bj...@yaymicro.com>
>
>>
>>
>> 2010/10/4 VANKEISBELCK Remi <r...@rvkb.com>
>>
>> Yes it's all in web.xml.
>>>
>>> You certainly already have defined a mapping for the dispatcher servlet ?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> No, thats the thing, in my web.xml there is only a servlet like this. No
>> refference to a stripes DispatcherServlet.
>>
>> <servlet>
>> <servlet-name>default</servlet-name>
>>
>> <servlet-class>org.apache.catalina.servlets.DefaultServlet</servlet-class>
>> <init-param>
>> <param-name>debug</param-name>
>> <param-value>0</param-value>
>> </init-param>
>> <init-param>
>> <param-name>listings</param-name>
>> <param-value>false</param-value>
>> </init-param>
>> <load-on-startup>1</load-on-startup>
>> </servlet>
>>
>> Then there is the mapping that I mentioned in the initial post.
>>
>>
>> Nothing
>>
>>>
>>> The way to map your actions in the web.xml goes like this :
>>>
>>> <servlet>
>>> <servlet-name>StripesDispatcher</servlet-name>
>>>
>>> <servlet-class>net.sourceforge.stripes.controller.DispatcherServlet</servlet-class>
>>> <load-on-startup>1</load-on-startup>
>>> </servlet>
>>>
>>> <servlet-mapping>
>>> <servlet-name>StripesDispatcher</servlet-name>
>>> <url-pattern>/dispatcher</url-pattern>
>>> </servlet-mapping>
>>> <!-- all in action folder -->
>>> <servlet-mapping>
>>> <servlet-name>StripesDispatcher</servlet-name>
>>> <url-pattern>/action/*</url-pattern>
>>> </servlet-mapping>
>>>
>>> <!-- all .action suffixes -->
>>> <servlet-mapping>
>>> <servlet-name>StripesDispatcher</servlet-name>
>>> <url-pattern>*.action</url-pattern>
>>> </servlet-mapping>
>>>
>>> <!-- action with @UrlBinding("/view/{foo}/{bar}") -->
>>> <servlet-mapping>
>>> <servlet-name>StripesDispatcher</servlet-name>
>>> <url-pattern>/view/*</url-pattern>
>>> </servlet-mapping>
>>>
>>> HTH
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> Remi
>>>
>>
>> I tried deleting the servlet that I had and replacing it with your
>> suggestion, then I couldn't get any pages anymore. *scratch head*
>>
>>
>>> 2010/10/4 Oddbjørn Sjøgren <bj...@yaymicro.com>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 11:33 AM, VANKEISBELCK Remi <r...@rvkb.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> I think you have an url mapping issue : I guess Stripes dispatcher is
>>>>> mapped on "*.action", so :
>>>>>
>>>>> http://.../myapp/search.action?searchString=foo...-> OK
>>>>> http://.../myapp/search?searchString=foo -> Error
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That's right. *.action is the default mapping when I have not explicitly
>>>> set one right?
>>>>
>>>> Otherwise the clean URLs should work by default, so :
>>>>> http://.../myapp/search.action/foo -> OK
>>>>>
>>>>> If you want to do it like this :
>>>>> http://.../myapp/search/foo
>>>>>
>>>>> Then you have two options :
>>>>> * define a mapping for dispatcher servlet on all your beans (as you
>>>>> don't have the *.action suffix)
>>>>> * use Dynamic Mapping Filter
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I've pretty much understood that, but I just don't understand how
>>>> to go about and do that.. Is it only a matter of changing the web.xml file?
>>>> Could someone give me a short example on what I do?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> HTH
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>
>>>>> Remi
>>>>>
>>>>> 2010/10/3 Oddbjørn Sjøgren <bj...@yaymicro.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm trying to implement clean URLs in a project, but I can't get to
>>>>>> work. Right now the web.xml file has theese mappings:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <servlet-mapping>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <servlet-name>default</servlet-name>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <url-pattern>/</url-pattern>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> </servlet-mapping>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <servlet-mapping>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <servlet-name>jsp</servlet-name>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <url-pattern>*.jsp</url-pattern>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> </servlet-mapping>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <servlet-mapping>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <servlet-name>jsp</servlet-name>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <url-pattern>*.jspx</url-pattern>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> </servlet-mapping>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My ActionBeans all have a URL binding like
>>>>>> UrlBinding("/search.action") on them, and the link
>>>>>> http://domain.com/search.action?searchString=foo obviously searches
>>>>>> for "foo". Now here is what I want:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - All urls should work as they are now (I don't want a lot of dead
>>>>>> links)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - In addition I want to introduce urls that look like
>>>>>> http://domain.com/search/foo
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Basically my question is how to achieve this. So far I've only tried
>>>>>> to change the the binding in the ActionBean to
>>>>>> @UrlBinding("/search/{searchString}") but that only leads to 404 errors.
>>>>>> I
>>>>>> guess there is something I need to do in the web.xml file, but I just
>>>>>> can't
>>>>>> understand what to do. I also understand that there is some way to
>>>>>> override
>>>>>>
>>>>>> NameBasedActionResolver, but I'm not sure how to do this? Can I just
>>>>>> write a new class that extends it and override it's methods? Will this
>>>>>> class
>>>>>> magically be used instead, or do I have to tell Stripes to use it
>>>>>> somehow?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm running stripes 1.5.3 and java 1.6.0 on Linux
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any help is greatly appreciated.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bjorn
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> Virtualization is moving to the mainstream and overtaking
>>>>>> non-virtualized
>>>>>> environment for deploying applications. Does it make network security
>>>>>> easier or more difficult to achieve? Read this whitepaper to separate
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> two and get a better understanding.
>>>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/hp-phase2-d2d
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Stripes-users mailing list
>>>>>> Stripes-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stripes-users
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> Virtualization is moving to the mainstream and overtaking
>>>>> non-virtualized
>>>>> environment for deploying applications. Does it make network security
>>>>> easier or more difficult to achieve? Read this whitepaper to separate
>>>>> the
>>>>> two and get a better understanding.
>>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/hp-phase2-d2d
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Stripes-users mailing list
>>>>> Stripes-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stripes-users
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virtualization is moving to the mainstream and overtaking non-virtualized
environment for deploying applications. Does it make network security
easier or more difficult to achieve? Read this whitepaper to separate the
two and get a better understanding.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/hp-phase2-d2d
_______________________________________________
Stripes-users mailing list
Stripes-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stripes-users
