Are you using Netbeans, Eclipse WTP or any other IDE for development?
2010/10/4 Oddbjørn Sjøgren <bj...@yaymicro.com>:
> I'm so sorry, I was looking (and editing) the wrong xml file. I guess there
> can actually be two web.xml files? I have one in
> tomcat/apache-tomcat-6.0.16/conf/web.xml
> and one (more local) in
> tomcat/apache-tomcat-6.0.16/webapps/ROOT/WEB-INF/web.xml
> Since changing the first one had effect on my website I assumed I had found
> the right one, but they are both used I guess?
> This was what confused me, and I got it working now. Thank you so much, and
> so sorry for this silly mistake.
> Bjorn
> 2010/10/4 VANKEISBELCK Remi <r...@rvkb.com>
>>
>> Huh..? I can't see how Stripes would work without dispatcher servlet
>> mapping or at least DMF... It ain't Stripes related btw, that's just how
>> servlets work, with URL mappings...
>>
>> You can post your web.xml here if it's ok for you ?
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Remi
>>
>> 2010/10/4 Oddbjørn Sjøgren <bj...@yaymicro.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2010/10/4 VANKEISBELCK Remi <r...@rvkb.com>
>>>>
>>>> Yes it's all in web.xml.
>>>>
>>>> You certainly already have defined a mapping for the dispatcher servlet
>>>> ?
>>>
>>> No, thats the thing, in my web.xml there is only a servlet like this. No
>>> refference to a stripes DispatcherServlet.
>>> <servlet>
>>> <servlet-name>default</servlet-name>
>>>
>>> <servlet-class>org.apache.catalina.servlets.DefaultServlet</servlet-class>
>>> <init-param>
>>> <param-name>debug</param-name>
>>> <param-value>0</param-value>
>>> </init-param>
>>> <init-param>
>>> <param-name>listings</param-name>
>>> <param-value>false</param-value>
>>> </init-param>
>>> <load-on-startup>1</load-on-startup>
>>> </servlet>
>>> Then there is the mapping that I mentioned in the initial post.
>>>
>>> Nothing
>>>>
>>>> The way to map your actions in the web.xml goes like this :
>>>>
>>>> <servlet>
>>>> <servlet-name>StripesDispatcher</servlet-name>
>>>>
>>>> <servlet-class>net.sourceforge.stripes.controller.DispatcherServlet</servlet-class>
>>>> <load-on-startup>1</load-on-startup>
>>>> </servlet>
>>>>
>>>> <servlet-mapping>
>>>> <servlet-name>StripesDispatcher</servlet-name>
>>>> <url-pattern>/dispatcher</url-pattern>
>>>> </servlet-mapping>
>>>>
>>>> <!-- all in action folder -->
>>>> <servlet-mapping>
>>>> <servlet-name>StripesDispatcher</servlet-name>
>>>> <url-pattern>/action/*</url-pattern>
>>>> </servlet-mapping>
>>>>
>>>> <!-- all .action suffixes -->
>>>> <servlet-mapping>
>>>> <servlet-name>StripesDispatcher</servlet-name>
>>>> <url-pattern>*.action</url-pattern>
>>>> </servlet-mapping>
>>>>
>>>> <!-- action with @UrlBinding("/view/{foo}/{bar}") -->
>>>> <servlet-mapping>
>>>> <servlet-name>StripesDispatcher</servlet-name>
>>>> <url-pattern>/view/*</url-pattern>
>>>> </servlet-mapping>
>>>>
>>>> HTH
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>>
>>>> Remi
>>>
>>> I tried deleting the servlet that I had and replacing it with your
>>> suggestion, then I couldn't get any pages anymore. *scratch head*
>>>>
>>>> 2010/10/4 Oddbjørn Sjøgren <bj...@yaymicro.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 11:33 AM, VANKEISBELCK Remi <r...@rvkb.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think you have an url mapping issue : I guess Stripes dispatcher is
>>>>>> mapped on "*.action", so :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://.../myapp/search.action?searchString=foo...-> OK
>>>>>> http://.../myapp/search?searchString=foo -> Error
>>>>>
>>>>> That's right. *.action is the default mapping when I have not
>>>>> explicitly set one right?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Otherwise the clean URLs should work by default, so :
>>>>>> http://.../myapp/search.action/foo -> OK
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you want to do it like this :
>>>>>> http://.../myapp/search/foo
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then you have two options :
>>>>>> * define a mapping for dispatcher servlet on all your beans (as you
>>>>>> don't have the *.action suffix)
>>>>>> * use Dynamic Mapping Filter
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, I've pretty much understood that, but I just don't understand how
>>>>> to go about and do that.. Is it only a matter of changing the web.xml
>>>>> file?
>>>>> Could someone give me a short example on what I do?
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> HTH
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Remi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2010/10/3 Oddbjørn Sjøgren <bj...@yaymicro.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm trying to implement clean URLs in a project, but I can't get to
>>>>>>> work. Right now the web.xml file has theese mappings:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <servlet-mapping>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <servlet-name>default</servlet-name>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <url-pattern>/</url-pattern>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> </servlet-mapping>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <servlet-mapping>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <servlet-name>jsp</servlet-name>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <url-pattern>*.jsp</url-pattern>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> </servlet-mapping>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <servlet-mapping>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <servlet-name>jsp</servlet-name>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <url-pattern>*.jspx</url-pattern>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> </servlet-mapping>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My ActionBeans all have a URL binding like
>>>>>>> UrlBinding("/search.action") on them, and the
>>>>>>> link http://domain.com/search.action?searchString=foo obviously
>>>>>>> searches for
>>>>>>> "foo". Now here is what I want:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - All urls should work as they are now (I don't want a lot of dead
>>>>>>> links)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - In addition I want to introduce urls that look
>>>>>>> like http://domain.com/search/foo
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Basically my question is how to achieve this. So far I've only tried
>>>>>>> to change the the binding in the ActionBean to
>>>>>>> @UrlBinding("/search/{searchString}") but that only leads to 404
>>>>>>> errors. I
>>>>>>> guess there is something I need to do in the web.xml file, but I just
>>>>>>> can't
>>>>>>> understand what to do. I also understand that there is some way to
>>>>>>> override
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> NameBasedActionResolver, but I'm not sure how to do this? Can I just
>>>>>>> write a new class that extends it and override it's methods? Will this
>>>>>>> class
>>>>>>> magically be used instead, or do I have to tell Stripes to use it
>>>>>>> somehow?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm running stripes 1.5.3 and java 1.6.0 on Linux
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any help is greatly appreciated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bjorn
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> Virtualization is moving to the mainstream and overtaking
>>>>>>> non-virtualized
>>>>>>> environment for deploying applications. Does it make network security
>>>>>>> easier or more difficult to achieve? Read this whitepaper to separate
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> two and get a better understanding.
>>>>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/hp-phase2-d2d
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Stripes-users mailing list
>>>>>>> Stripes-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stripes-users
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> Virtualization is moving to the mainstream and overtaking
>>>>>> non-virtualized
>>>>>> environment for deploying applications. Does it make network security
>>>>>> easier or more difficult to achieve? Read this whitepaper to separate
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> two and get a better understanding.
>>>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/hp-phase2-d2d
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Stripes-users mailing list
>>>>>> Stripes-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stripes-users
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Virtualization is moving to the mainstream and overtaking non-virtualized
> environment for deploying applications. Does it make network security
> easier or more difficult to achieve? Read this whitepaper to separate the
> two and get a better understanding.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/hp-phase2-d2d
> _______________________________________________
> Stripes-users mailing list
> Stripes-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stripes-users
>
>
--
Richard Hauswald
Blog: http://tnfstacc.blogspot.com/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardhauswald
Xing: http://www.xing.com/profile/Richard_Hauswald
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great
experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb
_______________________________________________
Stripes-users mailing list
Stripes-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stripes-users
