> > Is it okay if I add you as an author to the JavaDocs? Yep :)
> > Afterwards we are ready for the 0.2.0 release. Cool. I guess we need to update the docs with all the new stuff? > > So ... what do we want to implement next? :-) I'd really like to include the ActionInterceptor.destroy() stuff I sendt you. It's really usefull for interceptors that needs to clean up after themselves. Imagine this scenario for instance: My interceptor starts a java.util.TimerTask. The TimerTask lives in the system classloader and is not affected by a webapp reaload. If the interceptor is not notified when the webapp is reloaded it will not have a chance to cancel the TimerTask, and the interceptor in the reloaded webapp will add a new one. After five reloads you would have five TimerTasks running on top of each other. It's not much code and I have it all ready. I'd also like to argue for this change being included in SAIF 0.2. With this change I think the primary interface (ActionInterceptor) can solidify which will move SAIF out of the alpha stage. I can not think of any other basic functionality SAIF needs right now. I think it is very important to keep the SAIF-core in line with the KISS pinciple (http://www.faqs.org/docs/jargon/K/KISS-Principle.html). Maybe its time to focus on optional add-ons pluss stability and performance improvements? We have been discussing adding an adapter layer for IoC containers. I can start having a look at that if you want. I have nothing against adding optional functionality to SAIF, but I believe it is wery important to keep the SAIF core "clean". That is: People should be able to use SAIF proper without adding additional libraries to their apps. This can be achieved by having a proper plug-in architecture and/or referencing optional libs through reflection in the core classes. I can also do some profiling of the SAIF code if you want. I was also wondering what your attitude to unit testing is? I could have a look at making Cactus tests for SAIF. However, I believe this is an "all or nothing" descicion. Either we dont use unit testing or we back *all* new functionality with tests. CHR > -----Original Message----- > From: Lars Hoss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 28. november 2003 18:47 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Fwd: [Struts-apps] [SAIF] Added support for interceptor > properties per action > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Sorry, but I replied to the author. Here's the response. > > Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail: > > > Von: Lars Hoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Datum: 28. November 2003 18:45:15 MEZ > > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Betreff: Re: [Struts-apps] [SAIF] Added support for interceptor > > properties per action > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Hi! > > > >> Is it not better to keep the configuration on one level? > > > > Well, perhaps yes. But someone asked me to implement this feature. > > Anyway, cool that everything works :-) > > > > Is it okay if I add you as an author to the JavaDocs? > > Afterwards we are ready for the 0.2.0 release. > > > > So ... what do we want to implement next? :-) > > > > Yours, > > Lars > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Version: PGP 8.0.3 > > > > iQA/AwUBP8eJtrcyzbDWnRDCEQIL1QCg/yXcrU37w0oEFThXsdY2ArCSL0YAoOKh > > NNwkdud4b+5QdYbW8FBWhT2L > > =sq+1 > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: PGP 8.0.3 > > iQA/AwUBP8eKDLcyzbDWnRDCEQIpnQCg7u5AKB9Oe+CKAhYGLupPCL04ilgAoIf2 > IztJbB6f0ZRa/YShWxZ5nl2M > =xAz9 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it > help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help > YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > _______________________________________________ > Struts-apps mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/struts-apps > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Struts-apps mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/struts-apps
