Here's the draft roadmap that I wrote up.
Struts 1.1
* Servlet 2.2 / JSP 1.1 based
* tiles & validator first class citizens
* tiles module aware
* validator module aware
* Struts-el tag lib at contrib status
* [need help here] ??? factored out into jakarta commons
* resources factored out into commons-resources?
Struts 1.2 January 2003 [duration: 2 months? ]
* Servlet 2.3 / JSP 1.2 based
* Struts-el tag lib integrated
* Support for distributed struts components within a single
application
(either by just having a list of them or by using some assembling
technology)
* tiles JSTL aware
* 1.1 bug fixes
* [need help here] ??? factored out into jakarta commons
Struts 2.0 Q2 2003 [duration: ??? months ]
* Servlet 2.4 / JSP 2.0
* JSF integration
[I'm not sure whether to tie these items in with the above roadmap or
not]
Struts 1.2
* investigate and prototype alternative module organizations including
* arbitrary levels of nesting
* locale based structuring
* inheritance of elements from base types
* struts-config
* tiles [already has this, but there may be ways to make it
cleaner]
* validators
* investigate adding identifier namespaces
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ted Husted [mailto:husted@;apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 5:04 AM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: RE: Tiles Refactorings for 1.1 compatability
>
>
> I posted a starter version of the roadmap so we'd have
> something to patch :0)
>
> http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/status.html
>
> -Ted.
>
>
> 10/16/2002 4:42:10 PM, "Byrne, Steven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Definitely a big part of what 1.1 is all about is
> integrating Tiles and
> >Validator into the main Struts distribution. Pulling them back into
> >pseudo-contrib status would not be a good thing.
> >
> >Has anyone estimated the level of effort to make each of
> them be sub-app
> >aware? I imagine it's non-trival, but not overly large.
> And, since we
> >have new, eager, smart committers with plenty of energy and
> motivation,
> >I would think that these changes could be done in a reasonable
> >timeframe, perhaps with a little guidance from the original
> authors of
> >the respective components.
> >
> >Steve
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: David Graham [mailto:dgraham1980@;hotmail.com]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 1:27 PM
> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Subject: RE: Tiles Refactorings for 1.1 compatability
> >>
> >>
> >> To me, validator and tiles are part of the core. Without
> >> them, struts loses
> >> much of its utility and importance.
> >>
> >> David
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> >From: Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >To: "Struts Developers List"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> >> >"'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >Subject: RE: Tiles Refactorings for 1.1 compatability
> >> >Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:54:18 -0500
> >> >
> >> >At 12:27 PM -0700 2002/10/16, Martin Cooper wrote:
> >> >> > Now that we have modules in play, would anyone VETO adding
> >> >>> the capability to have a delimited list of struts-
> >> >>> configs (for each module) -- to match what we do with the
> >> >>> tiles and validator configurations? If for no other
> >> >>> reason, than because we should be providing a consistent
> >> >>> approach across components.
> >> >>
> >> >>Would I veto adding new functionality in a second beta that
> >> everyone is
> >> >>waiting for a final release of? I'd have to seriously
> consider it.
> >> >
> >> >Would it seriously mess up the current release cycle to
> >> decouple Tiles and
> >> >Validator from the core as an attempt to simplify the 1.1
> >> release? It
> >> >seems like there needs to be a "middle-ground" between the
> >> "contrib" folder
> >> >and the core where useful tools can be developed and
> >> released without
> >> >interfering with the core.
> >> >
> >> >Joe
> >> >--
> >> >--
> >> >* Joe Germuska { [EMAIL PROTECTED] }
> >> >"It's pitiful, sometimes, if they've got it bad. Their eyes
> >> get glazed,
> >> >they go white, their hands tremble.... As I watch them I
> >> often feel that a
> >> >dope peddler is a gentleman compared with the man who
> sells records."
> >> > --Sam Goody, 1956
> >> >
> >> >--
> >> >To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >> ><mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
> >> >For additional commands, e-mail:
> >> ><mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
> >>
> >>
> >> _________________________________________________________________
> >> Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online
> >> http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >> <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
> >> For additional commands, e-mail:
> >> <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >--
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
> >For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
