I was given to understand that Struts-el needed Servlet 2.3, and so that's why I suggested having it in 1.2. But my main purpose was to create a common definition of what was going to be in each release (and have it track as things change), so it should reflect the shared belief of the developers.
David Karr -- care to chime in on whether Struts-el needs Servlet 2.3/JSP 1.2? Steve > -----Original Message----- > From: Eddie Bush [mailto:ekbush@;swbell.net] > Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 11:29 AM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: Re: Tiles Refactorings for 1.1 compatability > > > Byrne, Steven wrote: > > >Here's the draft roadmap that I wrote up. > > > >Struts 1.1 > > * Servlet 2.2 / JSP 1.1 based > > * tiles & validator first class citizens > > * tiles module aware > > * validator module aware > > * Struts-el tag lib at contrib status > > * [need help here] ??? factored out into jakarta commons > > * resources factored out into commons-resources? > > > >Struts 1.2 January 2003 [duration: 2 months? ] > > * Servlet 2.3 / JSP 1.2 based > > > -1 > > > * Struts-el tag lib integrated > > * Support for distributed struts components within a single > >application > > (either by just having a list of them or by using some assembling > > technology) > > * tiles JSTL aware > > > ? What is the problem with Tiles' JSTL awareness? > > > * 1.1 bug fixes > > > This would be about the only thing here IMHO. > > > * [need help here] ??? factored out into jakarta commons > > > >Struts 2.0 Q2 2003 [duration: ??? months ] > > * Servlet 2.4 / JSP 2.0 > > > -1 - 2.0 will be 2.3 /1.2 > > > * JSF integration > > > Right. > > >[I'm not sure whether to tie these items in with the above roadmap or > >not] > > > >Struts 1.2 > > * investigate and prototype alternative module > organizations including > > * arbitrary levels of nesting > > > This can be done now. > > > * locale based structuring > > * inheritance of elements from base types > > * struts-config > > * tiles [already has this, but there may be ways to make it > >cleaner] > > * validators > > * investigate adding identifier namespaces > > > The "sharing" is the thing we're struggling with - more precisely the > timing of implementing it. It has been suggested this would > happen in > 1.2, and I think that's acceptable. I think (personally) 1.2 should > focus *only* on how we will give "more brains" to modules. > It should be > a *quick* turn-around - throwing in 2.3 / 1.2 will do nothing to aid > it's quick delivery, and Craig himself suggested those changes (along > iwth JSF) be slated for 2.0. I like his idea. > > -- > Eddie Bush > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
